Dear Mr. Vibhakar Ramtirthkar,
Nice to see you back in the Citehr community. Your contributions to developing the community were significant before the interlude. I hope you will maintain the tempo.
Letting Go of the Employee
You have suggested letting go of the employee. Your contention is that the organization should not waste its precious resources in chasing an employee who has left, though unceremoniously.
Nevertheless, if the organization allows this kind of trend to persist, then anyway, it would incur losses. The sudden exit of the employee hampers operational continuity. The sudden absence could become the cause of customer dissatisfaction too.
Preventing a Stop-Gap Arrangement
Above all, we cannot allow the organization to become a stop-gap arrangement. Sooner the employee gets a better opportunity, if he/she is allowed to leave as per his/her wish, then the organization will reduce to a waiting room of the railway station. To nip this trend in the bud, it is important for the organization to remove a velvet glove and raise its legal fist. This will send a signal to the employees on the roll on what could happen if they abandon their employment. The legal action need not be aimed at exactly the employee who played truant but also at others by creating a deterrence in their mind.
Communication Through Actions
Communication need not always mean written or oral communication or body language. Many times the management of the company communicates through their actions and decisions. Though invisible, it sends a very strong message to the employees.
For Sakshi Gupta: Analyzing the Causes of Sudden Exit
Legal action apart, the causes of the sudden exit of the employee merit studying. Was it a case of the wrong hire? Why could the newly joined employee not be engaged with the organization? Was there any failure on the part of the reporting manager or the HOD? Whether the legal action will be taken or not, failure to retain an employee will be an organization's failure.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar