Dear Mr. Poonacha MP,
There are two sides to your post. One is to retain an employee, and another is to allow him to go. Let us discuss it one by one.
Retaining an Employee
If the employee has spent nine years in an organization, then overall he must have been attuned to the working culture. He must be carrying a wealth of tacit knowledge with him. Because of this tacit knowledge, your organization in general and you, in particular, might have developed a dependence on him. Therefore, to retain a long-serving employee, you may negotiate with him for a higher salary and a job enlargement at the same time. If he is not satisfied, then you may grant him a higher designation as well. Beyond this, there is nothing more you can do.
Allowing the Employee to Go
If the employee has spent nine years in a company, then it merits analysis of retaining him. Employee attrition is not always bad. If he goes, then what are the losses? Does his work correspond with the salary that he draws? Have you done this analysis? In fact, if you could arrange a replacement with a lower salary, then you will be able to bring down the employee cost.
Secondly, because of the long stay, the innovativeness of the long-serving employee gets blunted. In contrast, a new person always wishes to prove themselves and therefore, may infuse new ideas. Therefore, retaining this employee may mean the inability to bring new ideas. In that case, what is the cost of lost opportunities? You may calculate this loss also.
Thirdly, for the sake of retention, if you raise his salary, then in a small organization like yours, the news may spread, and it may fire up the ambition of the other employees. They may also put in papers to get a raise. Therefore, please calculate the cost of this unanticipated spin-off also.
Lastly, let us remember the age-old proverb "a rolling stone gathers no moss." However, it is not just a stone, but flowing water also gathers no moss. There is nothing permanent in life except change. Your mind has been conditioned to his stay in the organization. You could become upset because of his absence. However, consider this a temporary phase, and move on. Let the stagnated water in your organization start flowing, and prevent the moss it has been gathering.
Final Comments
For retaining a long-serving employee and allowing him to go, there are merits and demerits on both sides. Nevertheless, if you allow him to go, then you should be able to extract tacit knowledge from his head as much as possible and convert it into
explicit knowledge. To extricate tacit knowledge, you need to sit with him and record every small thing. He very well knows the attitudes and mindsets of the external parties that he deals with. His actions and decisions are based on this understanding. You may make a note of anything and everything. If you could do this, then you will be able to share this information with a newcomer, and this, in turn, will make it possible to offset the disturbance caused by the quitting of the long-serving employee.
We, the members of the public forum, can give suggestions as a neutral party. We will be able to see what you may not. However, the final call will be yours.
All the best!
Dinesh Divekar