Dear Kumar,
There are
four pillars of democracy viz., judiciary, legislature, executive and the media. Of the four, the first three are bestowed with the legitimate powers to enforce democratic values. Under such circumstances, the functioning of the important pillars on which democracy rests, should we call it as
interference?
What are the apprehensions if the private company is so sure of the domestic inquiry being legal and proper?
Your question is on the legality and properness of the domestic enquiry conducted by the private company. Nevertheless, should we just take at its face value the self-certification by the private company on the validness, legality or properness of the enquiry or allow the aggrieved party to approach the judiciary?
Alike media, the judiciary is also a watchdog and its presence itself is a sufficient deterrence to create the rule of law. If we remove the judiciary or dilute the role of judiciary citing it as
interference, then the unscrupulous elements of the society will have field days to create a
misrule of law.
Will society progress because of the
rule of law or unruliness?
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar