Dear Seniors,
During appraisals, we face a problem in identifying the actual rating of people because some HODs set lower standards for their subordinates while evaluating performance, and some HODs are very stringent raters and give a lower rating even to the star performer of the team. For example, if the highest performer of a lenient department HOD is at 95%, then even the top performer of a strict HOD is at 65%.
What could be done to ensure logical rating standards?
The KRAs of all departments must have a similar level of difficulty because it will impact the final ratings. Less challenging KRAs will receive higher ratings, and those with tough targets will receive lower ratings, posing a challenge for us. Therefore, we cannot directly correlate the increment percentage with the KRA scores.
Is there an easy method to normalize this issue?
Excluding the bell curve method of top 20%, middle 80%, and bottom 20% because it may occur that in one department, top performers may exceed 20% and vice versa. By enforcing the bell curve, we do not want to set limits on top/bottom performers.
Please suggest if you have any solutions for this issue.
During appraisals, we face a problem in identifying the actual rating of people because some HODs set lower standards for their subordinates while evaluating performance, and some HODs are very stringent raters and give a lower rating even to the star performer of the team. For example, if the highest performer of a lenient department HOD is at 95%, then even the top performer of a strict HOD is at 65%.
What could be done to ensure logical rating standards?
The KRAs of all departments must have a similar level of difficulty because it will impact the final ratings. Less challenging KRAs will receive higher ratings, and those with tough targets will receive lower ratings, posing a challenge for us. Therefore, we cannot directly correlate the increment percentage with the KRA scores.
Is there an easy method to normalize this issue?
Excluding the bell curve method of top 20%, middle 80%, and bottom 20% because it may occur that in one department, top performers may exceed 20% and vice versa. By enforcing the bell curve, we do not want to set limits on top/bottom performers.
Please suggest if you have any solutions for this issue.