Dear members,
Today for the campus placement, recruitment team of a 5-star luxury hotel chain had visited prominent B-school. At the beginning, HR Manager gave presentation about the hotel chain. Later he had open discussion with the students. In the course of interaction, he asked what they understand by being "professional". Students gave varied replies.
Lastly, he told that "for me, a professional is one who works for money"!
HR Manager could have been discreet while talking in front of students. They are stepping into the corporate world and they cannot develop wrong notions of management concepts. Secondly, HR Manager had visited on the behalf of his company and not in his personal capacity. Therefore, he had no business to express his personal views.
If we apply his logic, then even mercenary is also a "professional"!
Of course the HR Manager has luxury of inventing his definition but such experiments (or rather tinkering of the basic concepts) cannot be done in front of students. He could have written his blog or a book to prove his definition. He could have explored these ideas in front of the seasoned HR professionals of NHRD or NIPM but as it was a campus placement, his claim went uncontested.
Nevertheless, the incident casts a doubt on the "professionalism" of the HR Manager. Do you agree?
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
Today for the campus placement, recruitment team of a 5-star luxury hotel chain had visited prominent B-school. At the beginning, HR Manager gave presentation about the hotel chain. Later he had open discussion with the students. In the course of interaction, he asked what they understand by being "professional". Students gave varied replies.
Lastly, he told that "for me, a professional is one who works for money"!
HR Manager could have been discreet while talking in front of students. They are stepping into the corporate world and they cannot develop wrong notions of management concepts. Secondly, HR Manager had visited on the behalf of his company and not in his personal capacity. Therefore, he had no business to express his personal views.
If we apply his logic, then even mercenary is also a "professional"!
Of course the HR Manager has luxury of inventing his definition but such experiments (or rather tinkering of the basic concepts) cannot be done in front of students. He could have written his blog or a book to prove his definition. He could have explored these ideas in front of the seasoned HR professionals of NHRD or NIPM but as it was a campus placement, his claim went uncontested.
Nevertheless, the incident casts a doubt on the "professionalism" of the HR Manager. Do you agree?
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar