Accepting all the points mentioned above, while drafting a policy, the policy and procedure should be adaptable, and nobody should overlook the policy in view of their capacity/position. For example, when creating a policy that mandates all employees to undergo a check at the gate or use the provided gate, the top management, including the Managing Director, should be a role model for this process, without any exemptions.
Similarly, if there is a procedure requiring all payments to be supported by a bill/voucher, employees may attempt to create their own vouchers. I strongly believe that the systems and procedures we establish create loopholes that allow employees to find easy ways to adapt. For instance, an employee in the travel expense section could divert funds into their personal bank account due to a failure in the system and procedures, providing an opportunity for intelligent financial gain.
In the case of reimbursing employees for on-duty travel using their vehicles based on petrol receipts, some individuals may exploit this by presenting inflated bills. It would be more effective to implement a procedure based on kilometers traveled or fixed charges to prevent such misuse. Involving lower-level employees in drafting adaptable procedures is always beneficial.
Another example is when an Executive is tasked with creating a procedure for an entire department in a factory as part of ISO compliance, but in practice, some departments may follow their own practices that do not align with the established procedures, resulting in non-compliance and serious issues. If the concerned department had been involved in drafting and agreeing to the procedures, they would likely take ownership of adapting the procedures more willingly.
It is essential to note that any instances of non-compliance, failure, refusal, or circumvention of procedures for employees' advantage or misappropriation, as well as most accidents on the shop floor, are ultimately the responsibility of the management, despite the established procedures.