Performance Appraisal Policy and Coaching Conversation Forms
Have you made a policy on Performance Appraisal? If yes, is the subject of "Coaching Conversation Forms" (CCF) included in this policy? If so, has it been clearly mentioned who will raise this form, when it will be raised, who will approve it, and what the due date is for it to reach the HR department? If the policy guidelines are impeccably clear, have you communicated them to all the staff, and have they understood it?
You need to correct the policy if some of the points mentioned above are not included. At this stage, issue a private circular addressed to the defaulting employees on the submission of the CCF within a week. If they fail to do so, it would be considered misconduct, and disciplinary action would be initiated against them.
Responsibility of HODs
For the slackness in the submission of CCF, HODs are also responsible. Why have HODs allowed this delay, or are they also a party to this delay?
Submission of CCF for Q1 and Q2
If the CCF for Q1 is yet to be received, then what about CCF for Q2? What is the due date for the submission of these forms? You may issue one more circular for the submission of CCF for Q2 within a week.
HOD Meetings and Organizational Culture
Does the HOD meeting take place in your organization? If yes, how frequently does it take place? If you are the HOD of the HR Department or any other person, whoever the HOD is, why did he/she not raise this point in the HOD meeting? What was the holdup? Why was the delay acceptable to the leadership?
If we read between the lines, the incident could reflect on your organization's culture. Possibly, employees live in a myth that they are indispensable, and the submission of CCF need not be given priority as it is an "HR-related activity." Your larger challenge is how to remove this myth from their minds. One of the methods, as stated earlier, is to invoke negative discipline.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar