Objections raised by the applicant are valid. In the internal job placements, why did you ask irrelevant questions?
The Role of a Manager
A manager's job is to meet the deliverables of his or her department. To meet these deliverables, he or she must ensure the work is completed by subordinates. Effective managers require job knowledge and people-handling skills, which encompass conflict resolution, negotiation abilities, interpersonal skills, and more.
Value Addition in Managerial Positions
For a managerial position, whether the job candidate is internal or external, they are expected to add value. Value addition stems from industry knowledge, awareness of competitors, an innovative mindset, and more. Rather than focusing on these aspects, your approach seemed bureaucratic. What questions were posed regarding "Maths and Business knowledge"? Would the same questions have been asked of an external job candidate?
Relevance of Mathematics and Business Knowledge
Why was there a need to test on Mathematics and Business knowledge? Are the use of mathematical or statistical tools essential in that department? Could you clarify which department this position is in? Were questions asked relating to the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Key Result Areas (KRAs) of that department?
Recruitment Standards and Decision-Making
Some companies have stringent recruitment standards, only considering candidates with scores above 70%. Does your company adhere to such high standards? Is the decision-making process primarily analytical? Does your company utilize Operations Research (OR) techniques routinely?
Departmental Practices and Techniques
By the way, in which department do you work? What mathematical and statistical tools do you utilize in your role? What quantitative techniques are employed in your work? If you are from HR, have time and motion studies been conducted in your company? Have models of Linear Programming (LP) been used to determine optimal manpower? I am curious about this information.
I have analyzed the situation objectively. There is no personal animosity intended.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar