#Loss of confidence in employee would justify his dismissal from service. Â Supreme Court 113
#Branch Manager of a bank is not a ‘workman'. Guj. HC 143Â
#Unauthorised habitual absence of workman is a grave misconduct. Â Mad. HC 182
#Authority holding proceeding under S.7A of the EPF Act, will be vested with powers of Civil Court. All. HC 176Â
#Pre-deposit not warranted in an appeal in EPF Tribunal pertaining to damages and interests. Â Del. HC 133Â
#EPF Authority's order without identification of beneficiaries not sustainable.Gau. HC 201Â
#Probation period can't be enhanced beyond six months as stipulated by Model Standing Orders. Bom. HC 209
#Unintentional delay in deposit of EPF contributions will justify waiver of damages.P&H HC 142Â
#A salesman engaged in sales and publicity of company's products not a ‘workman'.Del. HC 130Â
#Permission to lead evidence untenable if not pleaded or applied by employer.Del. HC 132Â
#Collecting fare without issuing tickets will justify dismissal. All. HC 145Â
#P.F. Authority cannot defend its own order in higher court. Ker. HC 148Â
#Appeal against orders under section 7A or 7B of the Provident Fund Act mandates pre-deposit of determined amount. Del. HC 118
#Bias against Enquiry Officer cannot be inferred without supporting evidence. Del. HC 122Â
#Modifying dismissal, Labour Court has to record reasons. Â Supreme Court 113Â
#Selling tea and running grocery shop not necessarily ‘gainful employment'. Raj. HC 205Â
#Compensation received under Employees' Compensation Act will debar claim under ESI Act. Â Raj. HC 204
#Validity of domestic enquiry is main factor for deciding application for approval of dismissal. Bom. HC 169Â
#A Medical Representative is not a ‘workman' . Pat. HC 185
 #Punishment is discriminatory if in a similar case another delinquent employee is let off.Supreme Court 159Â
#Insurance Company is not liable to pay compensation in respect of an uninsured pillion rider. Bom. HC 175
#Confidence of Management will be lost in a habitual absentee. Â Mad. HC 182
#Termination of a probationer if sigmatic without holding enquiry will be vitiated.Bom. HC 209
#Public servant when Complainant, need not be examined at initial stage.Jhar. HC 154
#Termination of a workman after repeated extensions would amount to retrenchment.P&H HC 138Â
#Non-compliance of section 25-F of ID Act on termination will not always warrant reinstatement. P&H HC 138
#Repeated dispatching of letters at wrong address justifies dismissal. Del. HC 122
#Enquiry when vitiated, Award can be in favour of ‘workman'. Del. HC 132
#Continuous losses would justify interim protection by EPF Tribunal from pre-deposit.Del. HC 125
#Pre-deposit not necessary when appeal before EPF Tribunal pertains to escaped amount. Del. HC 133
#'Change in service condition' not attracted when transfer is part of contract of service. Â MP HC 157
#Termination not illegal when the employee admits her signature on resignation and receipt for payment. Â P&H HC 191
#Enquiry to be set aside if delinquent is not supplied copies of documents, as relied upon. Supreme Court 159
#Only the EPF Appellate Tribunal can confirm / modify / annul the order of EPF Authority. Bom. HC 193
#A bus conductor holds the post of trust. All. HC 145
#Years of unblemished record is important for imposing punishment. Gau. HC 152
#EPF Appellate Tribunal cannot pass conditional stay for damages. Del. HC 118
#Dismissal of a workman, who lied on oath in the Labour Court, is justified.Del. HC 122
#Dismissal of appeal by the EPF Appellate Tribunal before expiry of stipulated period untenable. Del. HC 133
#One can't claim accident compensation under two different Acts. Â Raj. HC 204
#Schools under State control or aided are exempted from coverage by Provident Fund Act. Raj. HC 192
#Failure of workman to support his claim on repeated opportunities shows he is not diligent. Â P&H HC 190
#Failure to prove employer-employee relationship would not entitle any relief.P&H HC 187
#In case of conflict between appointment letter and standing order the latter will prevail. Bom. HC 209
#Misconduct in causing loss by a worker for his personal gain would justify dismissal.Supreme Court 113
#Aggrieved workman can avail remedy under the ID Act. Ori. HC 197
#Section 33(2)(b) of the I.D. Act will be confined to the enquiry. Bom. HC 169
#An unreasoned order of any Authority is not sustainable. Bom. HC 202
#Discriminatory punishment is liable to be vitiated. Supreme Court 159
#Section 25F of ID Act not to be complied by an employer on termination of contractor's workman. P&H HC 187
#Branch Manager of a bank is not a ‘workman'. Guj. HC 143Â
#Unauthorised habitual absence of workman is a grave misconduct. Â Mad. HC 182
#Authority holding proceeding under S.7A of the EPF Act, will be vested with powers of Civil Court. All. HC 176Â
#Pre-deposit not warranted in an appeal in EPF Tribunal pertaining to damages and interests. Â Del. HC 133Â
#EPF Authority's order without identification of beneficiaries not sustainable.Gau. HC 201Â
#Probation period can't be enhanced beyond six months as stipulated by Model Standing Orders. Bom. HC 209
#Unintentional delay in deposit of EPF contributions will justify waiver of damages.P&H HC 142Â
#A salesman engaged in sales and publicity of company's products not a ‘workman'.Del. HC 130Â
#Permission to lead evidence untenable if not pleaded or applied by employer.Del. HC 132Â
#Collecting fare without issuing tickets will justify dismissal. All. HC 145Â
#P.F. Authority cannot defend its own order in higher court. Ker. HC 148Â
#Appeal against orders under section 7A or 7B of the Provident Fund Act mandates pre-deposit of determined amount. Del. HC 118
#Bias against Enquiry Officer cannot be inferred without supporting evidence. Del. HC 122Â
#Modifying dismissal, Labour Court has to record reasons. Â Supreme Court 113Â
#Selling tea and running grocery shop not necessarily ‘gainful employment'. Raj. HC 205Â
#Compensation received under Employees' Compensation Act will debar claim under ESI Act. Â Raj. HC 204
#Validity of domestic enquiry is main factor for deciding application for approval of dismissal. Bom. HC 169Â
#A Medical Representative is not a ‘workman' . Pat. HC 185
 #Punishment is discriminatory if in a similar case another delinquent employee is let off.Supreme Court 159Â
#Insurance Company is not liable to pay compensation in respect of an uninsured pillion rider. Bom. HC 175
#Confidence of Management will be lost in a habitual absentee. Â Mad. HC 182
#Termination of a probationer if sigmatic without holding enquiry will be vitiated.Bom. HC 209
#Public servant when Complainant, need not be examined at initial stage.Jhar. HC 154
#Termination of a workman after repeated extensions would amount to retrenchment.P&H HC 138Â
#Non-compliance of section 25-F of ID Act on termination will not always warrant reinstatement. P&H HC 138
#Repeated dispatching of letters at wrong address justifies dismissal. Del. HC 122
#Enquiry when vitiated, Award can be in favour of ‘workman'. Del. HC 132
#Continuous losses would justify interim protection by EPF Tribunal from pre-deposit.Del. HC 125
#Pre-deposit not necessary when appeal before EPF Tribunal pertains to escaped amount. Del. HC 133
#'Change in service condition' not attracted when transfer is part of contract of service. Â MP HC 157
#Termination not illegal when the employee admits her signature on resignation and receipt for payment. Â P&H HC 191
#Enquiry to be set aside if delinquent is not supplied copies of documents, as relied upon. Supreme Court 159
#Only the EPF Appellate Tribunal can confirm / modify / annul the order of EPF Authority. Bom. HC 193
#A bus conductor holds the post of trust. All. HC 145
#Years of unblemished record is important for imposing punishment. Gau. HC 152
#EPF Appellate Tribunal cannot pass conditional stay for damages. Del. HC 118
#Dismissal of a workman, who lied on oath in the Labour Court, is justified.Del. HC 122
#Dismissal of appeal by the EPF Appellate Tribunal before expiry of stipulated period untenable. Del. HC 133
#One can't claim accident compensation under two different Acts. Â Raj. HC 204
#Schools under State control or aided are exempted from coverage by Provident Fund Act. Raj. HC 192
#Failure of workman to support his claim on repeated opportunities shows he is not diligent. Â P&H HC 190
#Failure to prove employer-employee relationship would not entitle any relief.P&H HC 187
#In case of conflict between appointment letter and standing order the latter will prevail. Bom. HC 209
#Misconduct in causing loss by a worker for his personal gain would justify dismissal.Supreme Court 113
#Aggrieved workman can avail remedy under the ID Act. Ori. HC 197
#Section 33(2)(b) of the I.D. Act will be confined to the enquiry. Bom. HC 169
#An unreasoned order of any Authority is not sustainable. Bom. HC 202
#Discriminatory punishment is liable to be vitiated. Supreme Court 159
#Section 25F of ID Act not to be complied by an employer on termination of contractor's workman. P&H HC 187