The first statement of your post reads, "An HR professional needs to retain talented and well-performing candidates." Here, one needs to understand how performance is measured. On what parameters is it measured? Is what deserves to be measured being measured? Are measures customized? Is performance measured accurately? Without this data, it is difficult to say whether an employee is really "well-performing" or not.
Those who score 85% or more need special attention. They require special training courses. For this, the company needs to loosen its purse strings. To enhance their knowledge and skills, it is better if the company does not display its usual stinginess.
Your Confusion on Performance, Loyalty, and Commitment: It appears that you are confused about these concepts. A well-performing employee may not be loyal. Conversely, an under-performing employee could be loyal. Furthermore, a loyal employee may not be committed. Loyalty often lies towards a person, while commitment is towards the organization's values, personal values, or the job itself. Building commitment requires leadership to be committed to the mission, vision, and values of the organization. Many times, in pursuit of business expediency, leadership neglects the organization's values. Leaders who do this have no right to expect commitment from their employees.
High-level Performance: To address the questions raised in the first paragraph of this post, it is crucial to establish a well-designed Performance Management System (PMS) in the organization. Otherwise, accurately measuring performance becomes challenging.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar