Supreme Court Ruling: Why Clubs Must Pay ESI Contributions for Kitchen Operations

pca
There is no distinction between a hotel and an elite club when it comes to the contribution to the Employees State Insurance fund, the Supreme Court stated while dismissing the appeal of Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd last week. The court rejected the argument of the club that it was not "manufacturing" food in its kitchen and therefore the club was not a factory covered by the ESI law. "The kitchen is an integral part of the club which caters to the needs of its members on payment, thereby making the club fall within the definition of a factory," the Supreme Court emphasized, agreeing with ESI Corporation. The high court had already dismissed the club's petition. The appeal was dismissed with the searing remarks that the welfare law was not followed by the elite club and "it is very unfortunate that it has not paid ESI contribution for more than three decades."
1 Attachment(s) [Login To View]

If you are knowledgeable about any fact, resource or experience related to this topic - please add your views. For articles and copyrighted material please only cite the original source link. Each contribution will make this page a resource useful for everyone. Join To Contribute