The discussion above only shows that PMS (Performance Management System) is a very interesting and intriguing subject matter. It also shows that it can be viewed and understood from different perspectives. Hence, it may be difficult for some people to have a consensus on the matter, especially when they are coming from various or different points of view.
As one of those who developed the early PMS concept, what I could say is that there are only THREE (3) major factors that one should bear in mind when attempting to create and/or implement a PMS. These factors are: CONCEPT, FORM, and POLICY.
1. The CONCEPT should be able to define and explain very clearly the kind, type, and frequency of the appraisal that you wish to implement. It should identify the raters, the rating system, and the implication of the ratings vis-a-vis compensation, promotions, and rewards.
2. The FORM should be user-friendly and easy to administer, especially if your organization is big and the number of your employees runs to thousands. The form must be designed as simple as possible, preferably a "ONE-PAGER MATRIX" form that incorporates performance targets/goals, rating scores, and improvement plans.
3. The POLICY should be able to spell out the roles and responsibilities of the appraiser, the employee, HR, Management, and the Company. It should define clearly how disputes on ratings can be settled.
Best regards to all!
Regards,
Ed Llarena, Jr.
Managing Partner
Emilla International Consulting Services
Tel: [Phone Number Removed For Privacy Reasons]