Dear Satish,
The process you have given for PMS is a good one. However, we still need to be a little more cautious.
Understanding Performance Management Systems (PMS)
PMS is not just about measuring an individual's performance. It's not just about designing measures based on the organization's goals. PMS is more about the comprehensiveness of the measures. We need to question whether we are measuring what needs to be measured. Are our measures superficial?
Let me give you an example from my training on Purchase Management yesterday. One of the participants mentioned that they procured spares for capital equipment in 2008, which were never used and remained idle. Repeat purchases of spares were made in 2009, 2010, and 2011. Over the four years, the inventory of spare parts accumulated to Rs 4.5 Cr. After four years, they realized they were accumulating unnecessary inventory. Since 2012, they stopped buying spares; however, the capital equipment has now aged and is likely to be phased out.
The question arises: Why were spares purchased when there were sufficient spares in stock? Whose failure is this—Stores, Purchasing, or the CFO? Due to the absence of Key Result Areas (KRAs), nobody took responsibility, but the organization suffered.
Real-World Example of PMS Implementation
Another example from a client I worked with during a consulting assignment. When I designed the measures for the Civil Projects department, the Head of Department openly admitted that despite his vast experience of 37 years and having overseen hundreds of projects, it was the first time he encountered new measures to evaluate civil projects. He is about to retire.
Therefore, apart from the process, what you measure in PMS holds significant importance.
Thanks,
Dinesh V Divekar