Dear All,
In our factory (PSU), we engage contract labour on regular basis. For administering the contract labour matters, I have come up with following issues,
1. Contract labours are getting leave benefits (1 day for 20 working days), which is being paid to them by the contractor as leave encashment during final settlement. But contractors do not maintain separate leave register for that as CL (R&A) act has no provision regarding leave register. Factory inspector in their report is insisting that contractors must maintain a leave record (in form prescribed as factories act and rules).
2. In case factory inspector starts prosecution then what are the options available for the employer (occupier) for immediate defense.
3. Regarding licensing of contractors in case we issue 3 different work order to one single contractor for three different work in the same establishment during different times of the year as follows,
1st work order - issued in Jan 13 housekeeping job labours engaged 10
2nd work order - issued in Mar 13 maintenance job labours engaged 08
3rd work order -issued in May 13 Blasting job labours engaged 07
In that case as the contractor engaged/crossed 20 labours (10+8+7=25) in may 13, so he has to apply for license. In that case should he need to apply for 3 different license for 3 different jobs or he can apply for 1 license mentioning 3 jobs there.
4. In case a contractor engaging 5 workmen and thus not taken any license and completed the job. In that case, isnt he liable to submit FORM VI A.
5. In case a company engaged for testing and inspection of machineries, where the job of testing & inspection is done by its own employees who comes to the factory on an average 2-3 days in a week, should the matter be regularized by CL (R&A) act.
guidelines on above cases are required urgently.
Regards,
DG
In our factory (PSU), we engage contract labour on regular basis. For administering the contract labour matters, I have come up with following issues,
1. Contract labours are getting leave benefits (1 day for 20 working days), which is being paid to them by the contractor as leave encashment during final settlement. But contractors do not maintain separate leave register for that as CL (R&A) act has no provision regarding leave register. Factory inspector in their report is insisting that contractors must maintain a leave record (in form prescribed as factories act and rules).
2. In case factory inspector starts prosecution then what are the options available for the employer (occupier) for immediate defense.
3. Regarding licensing of contractors in case we issue 3 different work order to one single contractor for three different work in the same establishment during different times of the year as follows,
1st work order - issued in Jan 13 housekeeping job labours engaged 10
2nd work order - issued in Mar 13 maintenance job labours engaged 08
3rd work order -issued in May 13 Blasting job labours engaged 07
In that case as the contractor engaged/crossed 20 labours (10+8+7=25) in may 13, so he has to apply for license. In that case should he need to apply for 3 different license for 3 different jobs or he can apply for 1 license mentioning 3 jobs there.
4. In case a contractor engaging 5 workmen and thus not taken any license and completed the job. In that case, isnt he liable to submit FORM VI A.
5. In case a company engaged for testing and inspection of machineries, where the job of testing & inspection is done by its own employees who comes to the factory on an average 2-3 days in a week, should the matter be regularized by CL (R&A) act.
guidelines on above cases are required urgently.
Regards,
DG