I have a different view. Granting compensatory time off for holidays on which an employee undertakes travel on duty may not be a prudent administrative practice for the following reasons.
Potential Anomalies in Compensatory Time Off
It may create an anomalous situation. Suppose a company has a five-day work schedule, and an employee has to travel by train for two days to reach his place of stay (as the company's business interests spread far and wide). If he travels on Saturday and Sunday and reports for work on Monday at the place of stay, then undertakes his return journey on the following Saturday and Sunday, reaching headquarters on Sunday night, he would be eligible for four compensatory days off. After reporting for duty on Monday, he would abstain from work for the entire week if allowed to take all four compensatory days off, followed by the regular weekend. What if the employee's job involves two such trips in a month?
Alternative Compensation Methods
An employee on travel may be adequately reimbursed by being a bit more generous in determining the amount for his lodging allowance, daily travel expenses at the place of stay, and his hotel accommodation to compensate for the time lost for rest.
Understanding the Concept of Compensatory Time Off
The concept of compensatory time off is to compensate for the holiday on which an employee is required to work. Therefore, on a holiday, instead of resting, the employee invests his physical and mental resources to produce goods or provide services as expected by the management. An employee traveling during holidays, though on duty, does not actually work with tools or pen but only travels. Thus, providing compensatory time off for travel on holidays may seem to contradict the fundamental concept of compensatory time off.
This is just a viewpoint. However, such decisions fall within the discretion of the company, and this discretion should be based on prudence.
Regards,
B. Saikumar