The following response is quoted from my own response submitted earlier (on 26th October 2013, 05:51 PM) in the thread:
https://www.citehr.com/470514-perfor...facturing.html
The above thread is a prequel to this thread posted by the member.
Dear Kanika, I have gone through this thread carefully.
Understanding Recruitment's Role in HR
This is your second query on the thread: "So, I want to know what initiatives can be taken and in what way I can prove myself, that there are so many things in HR that can be done. I am very confused about what to do?"
I totally agree with the views of your MD (recruitment is just 20% of the HR profile) on the content part, but differ on the "extent." In my opinion, if it's a running concern, then recruitment is just 5-10% of the HR profile, maybe even less!
Why?
Recruitment has slowed down in the wake of the economic slowdown. How many companies are recruiting? And in what numbers?
Moreover, you will only be recruiting to the extent of your attrition—natural or otherwise. You cannot accommodate more and more people unless there is a requirement.
The only situation where recruitment can be more than 20% is where a new plant or expansion of production capacity is taking place, a greenfield project is being executed, or a new business division/vertical/unit is being planned.
So your MD is right.
You are from the IT sector where the attrition rate is high, and people constitute the asset/working capital/machinery of the company.
Mr. Narayan Murthy once famously said something like - our assets become nil after office hours - implying that employees are their assets and after the employees leave the office, there is almost nothing left.
Moreover, IT being a high-tech field, HR professionals are not aware of the "manufacturing process."
So, in your case, it's OK to assume that recruitment (apart from employee engagement) is what HR is all about.
Evaluating Performance in Manufacturing
Now, coming to your first query, which to me is the root cause of your misery; your first (initial) query was about
:
"As there are departments like packing, cutting, lining, pattern, spray... What is the best way to measure their performance?"
The seniors have given you very good inputs. Have you benefited from it by implementing any of their suggestions?
What kind of Time and Motion study did you make?
I agree that the intricacies are best handled by professionals from Production Management, Operation Research, or Industrial Engineering.
However, an HR should be aware of the manufacturing process.
How many hours did you spend on the shop floor?
Do you make it a point to visit the shop floor once every day?
Have you interacted with managers, supervisors, technicians, and workers?
Have you been told about any "bottlenecks" in the process?
What kind of process is employed—whether it's job-shop, batch, or assembly-line?
Can you draw a diagram of your typical Work-Flow Process?
I understand that it's not very comfortable to be on the shop floor, especially with the obnoxious smells that the leather and the chemicals, paints, and adhesives give off.
I have never worked in the leather manufacturing sector, but I have visited the Bata factory, which is highly automated with an assembly-line system of production. The performance of individual workers is easy to monitor, as it's based on work-flow and the capacity of the installed equipment.
In your case, since it is an exclusively garment manufacturing unit, it must be working on JOB SHOP process flow structures. Here, there is a scope for better "line-balancing," having systems like Kanban, 5S to improve productivity and reduce wastages, and improving the logistics of materials.
These are somewhat beyond the scope of a junior HR and need the involvement of management. If management is serious, they may hire an external consultant to initiate these or have training programs for employees.
To become a successful HR, one needs to engage and immerse oneself with the business process, rather than sit on a chair twiddling one's thumb and lamenting the shortcomings of one's experience and the situation.
There is a lot more in HR than meets the eye. HR can be a true business partner and help in strategic differentiation.
Warm regards.
Dinesh Divekar Appreciated this.
..............................
Raj Kumar
“Non Nascor Mihi Solum” [Latin; meaning “I was not born for myself alone”]
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."
attribution
https://www.citehr.com/470514-perfor...#ixzz2izeMNc9Q