Supreme Court Ruling on Language Correspondence
The Supreme Court, in its order dated 1st May 2013 (copy attached), has held that the Government cannot refuse to correspond with employees in Hindi if required by them. Referring to the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules 1965, the Court stated that if an employee desires, they can insist that the Government reply in Hindi only.
In this case, Mithilesh was appointed as a High Skilled worker in 1994. He was issued a charge sheet in 2004 for alleged misbehavior with a senior officer. Being weak in English, he requested all communication to be in Hindi only. However, his request was denied. The Bombay High Court supported the view of the Central Administrative Tribunal. Nevertheless, on appeal, the Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision and ruled in favor of the employee.
Regards
The Supreme Court, in its order dated 1st May 2013 (copy attached), has held that the Government cannot refuse to correspond with employees in Hindi if required by them. Referring to the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules 1965, the Court stated that if an employee desires, they can insist that the Government reply in Hindi only.
In this case, Mithilesh was appointed as a High Skilled worker in 1994. He was issued a charge sheet in 2004 for alleged misbehavior with a senior officer. Being weak in English, he requested all communication to be in Hindi only. However, his request was denied. The Bombay High Court supported the view of the Central Administrative Tribunal. Nevertheless, on appeal, the Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision and ruled in favor of the employee.
Regards
1 Attachment(s) [Login To View]