Hi Everyone,
I fully agree with Ashish on "USE AND THROW" of his skill topic, this is not only in IT industry but in other big units also. I have seen one company of repute picking up experts in their field of engineering and after not giving same treatment as of their own executive trainees. The company has recognized this as a practice, Level I- ETs; Level II- Non ETs during promotions. They are regularly termed as Non-ETs as if they are not performing.
It is wrong to make use of expertise of an experienced employee not to recognize their efforts to improve or train their juniors (ETs). But the person relies this only after few years and has no option either to continue service or to quit.
In a large pool of executives (ETs) selected regularly such skilled persons are very few and have no say among them. Though employee satisfaction is very much necessary and it is proved only, when you make the employee feel that he is being treated as a family member and not just "USE AND THROW" of his skill, but who cares when such cases are in minority.....
When the subject has come in this forum, executives in Human Recourse field must look into such cases and try to improve such practice in their organization and feel proud of removing such practice.
Thanks & regards,
AK Mathur
I fully agree with Ashish on "USE AND THROW" of his skill topic, this is not only in IT industry but in other big units also. I have seen one company of repute picking up experts in their field of engineering and after not giving same treatment as of their own executive trainees. The company has recognized this as a practice, Level I- ETs; Level II- Non ETs during promotions. They are regularly termed as Non-ETs as if they are not performing.
It is wrong to make use of expertise of an experienced employee not to recognize their efforts to improve or train their juniors (ETs). But the person relies this only after few years and has no option either to continue service or to quit.
In a large pool of executives (ETs) selected regularly such skilled persons are very few and have no say among them. Though employee satisfaction is very much necessary and it is proved only, when you make the employee feel that he is being treated as a family member and not just "USE AND THROW" of his skill, but who cares when such cases are in minority.....
When the subject has come in this forum, executives in Human Recourse field must look into such cases and try to improve such practice in their organization and feel proud of removing such practice.
Thanks & regards,
AK Mathur