Dear Senior, I would like to seek your expert advice. Presently, I am working with a Media/Event organization. We generally follow flexible hours, i.e., between 8:30 to 10:45 am, an employee can punch the card, complete 9 hours of shift, and leave. If, in case, any employee punches the card, e.g., at 10:55 am, they will be marked as having taken short leave for that particular day. However, if an employee works more than 9 hours but still has their leave/salary deducted, it can be quite demotivating for them. Even after working for 10 or 12 hours of a shift, just because they arrive 10 or 15 minutes late, they face deductions. Please advise on what we can suggest to amend this rule.
I would like to clarify that late arrivals initially get adjusted from the employee's leave balance. Once leaves are exhausted, the salary gets cut. However, employees in both cases are not satisfied just because they are putting in more than 9 hours.
Proposed Amendment to Attendance Policy
In my opinion, I would suggest that we make an amendment to the rule such that any employee who is in the office for over 50 hours in any week (instead of the minimum required 45 hours) will be entitled to adjust the time beyond 50 hours up to a maximum of one hour in that week against any late coming (or against leaving early, as the case may be).
I am seeking your suggestions as well. Please advise.
Regards, Manisha Singh
I would like to clarify that late arrivals initially get adjusted from the employee's leave balance. Once leaves are exhausted, the salary gets cut. However, employees in both cases are not satisfied just because they are putting in more than 9 hours.
Proposed Amendment to Attendance Policy
In my opinion, I would suggest that we make an amendment to the rule such that any employee who is in the office for over 50 hours in any week (instead of the minimum required 45 hours) will be entitled to adjust the time beyond 50 hours up to a maximum of one hour in that week against any late coming (or against leaving early, as the case may be).
I am seeking your suggestions as well. Please advise.
Regards, Manisha Singh