My replies to the previous posts are as below:
@KVDP_69: You need to improvise the procedure. In the right context, filling the blank KRA is fine. However, weights have to be decided immediately. What is there to keep confidential in weights? Secondly, the rating has to be done in numbers. Lastly, the appraisal also has to be done in front of juniors. Doing the rating confidentially is government style and it does not motivate the juniors.
Please note that performance appraisal is not just for the individual. It is a major tool of organizational development as well.
@SANKAR R: You have corroborated what I have said; however, you mention that "Weightage for KRA should be agreed upon by appraisee and appraiser." What if both of them do not agree? The manager must have overriding powers. What is the use of being a manager if he/she is placed on equal footing with the subordinate?
@MASHIKAKA: In addition to QCDPS, you need to add "Quantity" and "Customer Satisfaction" as well. Though these are linked with quality and delivery, these attributes need to be mentioned explicitly. Secondly, how will you measure "problem-solving" and "special tasks"?
Last Comments: Any KRA, if it is not SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Time-bound), is not a KRA.
Thanks,
DVD