The question is not simple, and no simplistic answers will do! Kindly consider the following:
1. New Location or New Company?
- Please confirm if the question is of a new location or of a new company and a new location.
2. Ownership Changes
- Is the ownership going to remain the same?
3. Reason for Arrangement
- Do we know why this arrangement is being worked out?
4. Continuity of Employment
- Why is no "continuity of employment" being offered, as the arrangement offered is likely to adversely affect the "Gratuity" eligibility, "Bonus" eligibility, etc.?
5. New Appointment Terms
- If F & F is affected here and then a new appointment letter for a new job (in a new organization and/or new location) would be issued, what would be the terms & conditions (particularly the emoluments) offered in the new situation? What about the disturbance/relocation compensation, especially regarding, where applicable, children's education, living accommodation, transportation of household effects, old parents staying with the atypical employee?
In the absence of any knowledge or details in response to these and similar questions, it would appear to me that the employer would like to continue to receive the benefits of the knowledge and experience of the present employees and clearly avoid responsibilities toward even the probable difficulties employees may face due to the shift to a new location. Some of them may feel compelled to accept the terms being offered due to the absence of a choice or possibility of a job change, which will take some time anyway!
So much for the HR orientation of the organization's culture! I accept I have no right to sit in judgment, especially in the absence of knowledge of all pertinent facts, yet I fear my apprehensions could as well be well-founded!
Respond, ladies and gentlemen!
Regards,
Samvedan
September 19, 2012