Dismissal of an Employee
When an employee's services are terminated for bona fide reasons under standing orders, settlements, or service rules without any intention of punishing them, such terminations fall under the category of termination simpliciter (simple terminations). When an employee's services are terminated by way of punishment allegedly for misconduct, such terminations are regarded as punitive or stigmatic since the employee is dismissed for an allegation that casts stigma on their character and conduct without being heard.
While the Courts may not interfere with termination simpliciter of an employee, they may quash a dismissal if it was inflicted without hearing the employee concerned.
The principles of natural justice require that an employee shall not be punished for misconduct without being heard about such misconduct. These principles are not incorporated either under the Factories Act or the Industrial Disputes Act. A factory's standing orders (if applicable, since they are applicable to factories employing 100 or more workmen) or service rules incorporate these principles in the form of a disciplinary procedure. In view of these principles of natural justice, the following basic procedure has to be followed before punishing an employee:
1. They should be served with a charge-sheet setting out the specific details of allegations against them.
2. They should be asked to explain their allegations.
3. If their explanation is not satisfactory, you have to conduct a domestic enquiry into the charges where the employee will be given an adequate opportunity to defend themselves.
4. If they are found guilty in such a domestic enquiry, an appropriate penalty should be imposed on them.
Your company must have standing orders of its own or conduct rules which prescribe such a procedure.
In your case, the employee was dismissed for negligence in their work, which is an allegation against them. Therefore, they were dismissed allegedly for misconduct. Thus, you should have followed the above procedure before dismissing them.
You cannot treat it as retrenchment either, since such terminations will not be regarded as retrenchment as the definition of retrenchment under Sec. 2(oo) of the I.D Act excludes terminations by way of punishment from retrenchment.
If the employee is a workman within the meaning of the I.D Act, in all probability, they will raise an industrial dispute about their dismissal, terming it unlawful.
Regards,
B. Saikumar
HR & Labour Law Consultant
Chipinbiz Consultancy Pvt. Ltd
Mumbai