Judicial Review of Contractual Employment Termination
In light of evolving employment dynamics, the Supreme Court has affirmed that courts can intervene in cases of contractual job termination if the management's decision is deemed arbitrary. Justices Cyriac Joseph and T S Thakur emphasized that while judicial review is permissible, its scope is not unlimited.
"It is no longer acceptable for the authority issuing the order to claim that its actions, being contractual, are beyond judicial scrutiny. A writ Court has the right to review the action to assess any illegality, perversity, unreasonableness, unfairness, or irrationality that might invalidate the action, irrespective of its contractual nature," the court stated.
This ruling stemmed from a petition by Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd challenging the Orissa High Court's directive to reinstate an employee whose contractual position had been terminated.
While acknowledging the shift in legal perspectives over the years, the bench highlighted that courts can now review decisions regarding the termination of contractual jobs, allowing for scrutiny of the authority's actions.
"A review of this court's decisions and legal evolution in recent decades indicates a significant departure from the established legal stance, which previously allowed for the termination of contractual employment in line with the contract's terms, without providing employees protection against such terminations, even if one of the contracting parties was the State," the bench remarked.
Source: Termination of contractual job can be challenged in court, says Supreme Court - The Economic Times
Copy of judgment is attached for your information.
In light of evolving employment dynamics, the Supreme Court has affirmed that courts can intervene in cases of contractual job termination if the management's decision is deemed arbitrary. Justices Cyriac Joseph and T S Thakur emphasized that while judicial review is permissible, its scope is not unlimited.
"It is no longer acceptable for the authority issuing the order to claim that its actions, being contractual, are beyond judicial scrutiny. A writ Court has the right to review the action to assess any illegality, perversity, unreasonableness, unfairness, or irrationality that might invalidate the action, irrespective of its contractual nature," the court stated.
This ruling stemmed from a petition by Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd challenging the Orissa High Court's directive to reinstate an employee whose contractual position had been terminated.
While acknowledging the shift in legal perspectives over the years, the bench highlighted that courts can now review decisions regarding the termination of contractual jobs, allowing for scrutiny of the authority's actions.
"A review of this court's decisions and legal evolution in recent decades indicates a significant departure from the established legal stance, which previously allowed for the termination of contractual employment in line with the contract's terms, without providing employees protection against such terminations, even if one of the contracting parties was the State," the bench remarked.
Source: Termination of contractual job can be challenged in court, says Supreme Court - The Economic Times
Copy of judgment is attached for your information.
1 Attachment(s) [Login To View]