Dear All,
When I search on the internet, I found the following sentence on almost every site: "It's not voltage that kills, it's current!" Without the existence of voltage, current will not produce. So, how can we justify the above? Both are required to kill a person – current as well as voltage.
During my discussion with someone today, I mentioned the sentence: "It's not voltage that kills, it's current!" However, I was unable to justify my answer in the end.
Can 24V kill a person? Normally, we consider a 24V supply as a safe voltage, but can this 24 voltage still kill a person?
Can anyone provide a solution to my query? I hope to receive some solutions to the above two queries.
Thanks in advance.
When I search on the internet, I found the following sentence on almost every site: "It's not voltage that kills, it's current!" Without the existence of voltage, current will not produce. So, how can we justify the above? Both are required to kill a person – current as well as voltage.
During my discussion with someone today, I mentioned the sentence: "It's not voltage that kills, it's current!" However, I was unable to justify my answer in the end.
Can 24V kill a person? Normally, we consider a 24V supply as a safe voltage, but can this 24 voltage still kill a person?
Can anyone provide a solution to my query? I hope to receive some solutions to the above two queries.
Thanks in advance.