Should Religious Trusts Accept Large Cash Donations? Exploring Transparency and Ethics at Puttaparthi and TTD

P.Lakshminarayanan
With the recent finding of cash and valuables at Puttaparthi, it is being suggested by many that the trust be run on the lines of TTD at Tirumala. While I do not want to comment on the way the funds received through 'Hundi' at TTD are managed, I strongly feel that the system of receiving cash in the Hundi itself needs to be changed. I respect the sentiments of people who put small change or even a few tens of rupees either in the Archaka's plate or the Hundi. There is no problem with that.

It is the large bundles of cash and valuables which are dumped that should not be accepted by the authorities. We hear of large amounts – tens of lakhs or sometimes even a crore being found during the daily ritual of counting the collections. Since the person depositing the cash and its source are unknown, the amount has to be considered as black money. Why should any trust, even if it is in the name of a God, be allowed to deal with black money?

Suggestions for Modifying the Collection System

1. Provide boxes instead of the large open vessels as Hundi.
2. Provide only a small slot at the top permitting a single note or coins to pass through.
3. Most devotees (especially those who form the regular queue) will not be affected by this.
4. Large contributions should be accepted only through a bank transfer. If it makes the contributors feel happier for sentimental reasons, they can deposit the counterfoil of the transaction in the Hundi.
5. In the present scenario of net banking and wire transfers, the procedure will not inconvenience anyone who wants to deposit legal money.
6. The TTD board, bankers, and IT department should give an assurance that the information will not be made public unless something is amiss in the IT returns. This way the contribution will remain anonymous, as it should be (Gupt Daan).
7. This will also result in more transparency in the accounts of the board while reducing their (and the bankers') burden of counting large amounts of cash every day.

If there is a sharp dip in the collections, we can be sure that it is not because of the inconvenience due to the system but that the amounts collected previously were ill-gotten money. If it results in the reduction in the number of such VIP guests, it will make darshan easier for the common people. God can do without money - of any color, and he surely wouldn't want it in black.
boss2966
Dear Mr. Lakshminarayanan, our country is not a poor country. The proofs are coming one by one. Earlier days only Tirupathi was the only example. Now, 2 months back, the Puttaparthi issue came out and crores of rupees were uncovered. Currently, the Trivandrum Padmanabha Swami Temple has more than 5 lakh crores worth of jewelry (3 Rajas & 2 Air India). These jewels can be justified. However, keeping our currency idle without any movement is not acceptable, and depositing it in Foreign Banks is not tolerable at all.

Instead of focusing on temples and their properties, let the government concentrate on the inordinate wealth acquired by our politicians and bring it back to our economy to strengthen it.

As you mentioned, large donations should be transferred to the temple account through the bank only, not in cash. A CCTV must be installed in front of the hundi. Anyone depositing a substantial amount in bundles should be questioned about the fund flow and how it was generated, so that corruption can be minimized.

Thank you.
If you are knowledgeable about any fact, resource or experience related to this topic - please add your views. For articles and copyrighted material please only cite the original source link. Each contribution will make this page a resource useful for everyone. Join To Contribute