Dear All,
To the best of my knowledge and belief, a period of more than 6 months is to be rounded off to the next full year. According to this ruling, a period in excess of six months, which is 11 months and 17 days, is to be rounded off to the next full year, that is, a full 5 years, making the employee eligible and entitled to payment of gratuity. As suggested earlier by some friends, the concerned employee may apply to her employer for payment of gratuity in the prescribed form and await a reply. Certainly, the response should be positive. If it is negative, then the aggrieved employee may apply to the controlling authority for relief.
To avoid this, the concerned employee should have attempted to complete a 5-year tenure with his/her former employer. The notice of 90 days is the minimum period. The law does not forbid anybody from giving more than a 90-day notice. In this case, the notice period could have been 103 days. The new employer would have also not objected to a delay of 13 days to help the employee comply with the eligibility criteria for gratuity. Others may take a lesson and try to comply with the eligibility criteria for such short durations. The important issue here is whether the notice period can be more than 90 days or not. My assertion is that it can be more than 90 days, not short of 90 days in any case. I wish success to elamita in his/her efforts to get gratuity from her former employer and also note the lesson which could avoid such complications in the future.