Dear Vasant,
Before giving any opinion, we should go through the definition of the employee, which may be read as under:
"Sec 2 (e) 'employee' means any person (other than an apprentice) employed on wages in any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company, or shop to do any skilled, semi-skilled, or unskilled, manual, supervisory, technical, or clerical work, whether the terms of such employment are express or implied, and whether or not such a person is employed in a managerial or administrative capacity. However, it does not include any person who holds a post under the Central Government or a State Government and is governed by any other Act or by any rules providing for payment of gratuity."
After going through the definition, it is clear that an apprentice is not covered under this Act. However, it seems that we are not to consider the length of service of a trainee if they do not perform any skilled, semi-skilled, or unskilled, manual, supervisory, technical, or clerical work. If a person is appointed as a trainee under the I E (S O) Act, 1946 / CSO and does some work of any of the natures detailed above as part of the training scheme, then, in my opinion, this period of service should not be treated as service rendered for counting the service period for the payment of gratuity.
In general, management, after the completion of the trainee period, if there happens to be a vacancy, then they may re-employ them after clearing the F&F and adopting the procedure for interviews, etc. After adopting this procedure, we are not required to apply our minds for the consideration of this service period. Therefore, if a person is appointed as a trainee and does any of the work as mentioned above, then their service should be considered in the length of service for the consideration of the period of service under this Act. The interpretation of this matter ultimately depends on the Authorities under the Act; however, the situation is more favorable for a person who has worked as a trainee and is in continuity of service.
Opinion/comments submitted as requested.
Regards,
R.N.Khola
Vasant Nair said: "Yes, the training period is also part of an employee's employment, if there has been no definite break in service or if the training is under the Apprenticeship Act."
Vasant Nair
PS: Mr. Khola, I hope you do not mind my answering this query.