Dear friends,
Can anyone explain as to why CiteHR is far more actice than its counterparts - CiteOperations, CiteFinanace and CiteSales?
Why is there so much of discussions, exchange of ideas, postings of information, knowledge sharing happening in CiteHR?
Does this mean -
1. There are many HR professsionals, who are willing to share their knowledge than other professionals?
Or,
2.HR professionals have plenty of time to chat in the website, whereas other professionals are really busy with their work?
Or,
3.There are many new HR exceutives, who have entered the HR profession without having sufficient knowledge and ask fundamental questions through citehr? (Whereas other professionals do not have this need because they possess sufficient basic knowledge about their profession. For example, accounts executives might have done CA or ICWA and therefore do not have questions over basics?)
Or,
4.There is no single nationwide course or professional accredition body for HR and so the HR knowledge is not available in consolidated form, scattered across?
Or,
5.HR professionals have more issues than others, and the issues being people issues are often sensitive. So, there is no templated solution available for handling the issues. Hence the discussions.
Or,
6.HR is evolving as a great profession in India. HR professionals are into a great networking. HR people are more serious than others in making their companies competitive; they feel the need for excellence in organizational performance, its competence etc. So, they are quite active in knowing what is happening around. They want to know the benchmarks and implement the best people management practices in their workplaces.
Which of the above is true?
Can you please react and respond?
Jeev.
Can anyone explain as to why CiteHR is far more actice than its counterparts - CiteOperations, CiteFinanace and CiteSales?
Why is there so much of discussions, exchange of ideas, postings of information, knowledge sharing happening in CiteHR?
Does this mean -
1. There are many HR professsionals, who are willing to share their knowledge than other professionals?
Or,
2.HR professionals have plenty of time to chat in the website, whereas other professionals are really busy with their work?
Or,
3.There are many new HR exceutives, who have entered the HR profession without having sufficient knowledge and ask fundamental questions through citehr? (Whereas other professionals do not have this need because they possess sufficient basic knowledge about their profession. For example, accounts executives might have done CA or ICWA and therefore do not have questions over basics?)
Or,
4.There is no single nationwide course or professional accredition body for HR and so the HR knowledge is not available in consolidated form, scattered across?
Or,
5.HR professionals have more issues than others, and the issues being people issues are often sensitive. So, there is no templated solution available for handling the issues. Hence the discussions.
Or,
6.HR is evolving as a great profession in India. HR professionals are into a great networking. HR people are more serious than others in making their companies competitive; they feel the need for excellence in organizational performance, its competence etc. So, they are quite active in knowing what is happening around. They want to know the benchmarks and implement the best people management practices in their workplaces.
Which of the above is true?
Can you please react and respond?
Jeev.