Dear All,
Bifurcation of various leaves is done; first to take care of legislative requirements in each state and secondly to bring parity on account of industry practice.
Generally, each type of leave has significance and is hence prescribed. For example, CL is meant for attending to urgent and unforeseen casual nature of work which may not require long leave and it can be taken without permission on some occasions, not always. Whereas PL is meant for planned long leave with permission in advance as may have been fixed as per rules.
With this background and normal practice in the industry, a combination of PL with CL is discouraged and at times not permitted, whereas SL (Medical Leave) may be permitted with PL provided you don't have a balance of SL. Similarly, ML may be permitted with PL after 84 days of ML leave is over provided the lady staff is still not ready to join for reasons related to confinement.
Above all, these rules are said and done formulated to bring in uniformity and some amount of discipline among employees. The management does have the right to relax and make an exception in a very deserving case which should not become a precedent.
One of my friends has mentioned evoking section 9A of the ID Act. In my opinion, unless it relates to a reduction in the quantum of leave, this would not invite this section, to the best of my knowledge of law and experience in the industry.
Hope this shall provide some guidance to concerned citehr members.
Thanks,
Rajpal
Destination,
HR Consultancy Services,
Mumbai
022-66994552 (Direct) Mobile - 09821133027