Dear Forum Members, good evening to you all.
The question raised in the forum is whether compensatory time off in lieu of overtime (OT) is legal. Not at all, because OT is paid at double the rate (Basic + I.D.A.) to the employee, and there is a limit on working OT, averaging two hours per day. In the hotel industry, most OT may be attributed to the absence of relievers. The absence of a reliever compels the employee on duty to work an extra shift for which they are compensated illegally with comp time off. This is a wrong practice that hinders the efficiency of employees and the productivity of the organization. In some cases, employees are asked to work additional shifts due to workload, and they are allowed to accumulate comp time off, which is also not appropriate. Employees are required to use accumulated comp time off within a specified period, but often they choose to use it at their convenience without considering the business aspects. If this continues, it exacerbates the situation, creating a cycle of comp time off where other employees are asked to cover the extra duties.
What can we do? Meticulous manpower planning, especially for different seasons, should be implemented. Providing appropriate additional staff for reliever duties in duty rosters and rotating surplus manpower to needed sections should be considered for better results. This approach will reduce the burden of OT/comp time off and certainly improve work efficiency and productivity. Considering the business load, hiring temporary/casual/seasonal employees, apprentices, or trainees instead of relying on overtime may be an option. This strategy will increase the pool of trained staff in the industry, improve working conditions, and incur minimal payroll costs compared to OT/comp time off, while fostering cordial industrial relations.
R.K.SINGH