Dear Sajid,
I think you are getting overly excited and smart enough to edit your posts. Kind attention to your edited post: "Last edited by globaloverseas144; Yesterday at 03:31 PM.. Reason: calculation."
In your said post, there were no calculations given by you!
For other readers on this thread, I must tell them that earlier Mr. Sajid has written something else on this thread, which prompted me to reply to it. Everyone could very well appreciate that I have not used any defamatory or offensive language. Rather, I started my sentence addressed to Mr. Sajid with the words "Please don't take it otherwise."
It is not understood why Mr. Sajid is getting too rash.
Secondly, Mr. Sajid, in your last post, you said that I am putting an illegal blame on you. But my dear friend, please read my post carefully. I have reproduced the extracts of the ESI Employer Guide mentioned on Page 31, which was also attached to the post.
Thirdly, Mr. Sajid, you said that you are an LLM graduate and claim to have a level above me. No problem for me, you may be at a very high level from where you see yourself to be "GOD." Remain there in an isolated world of your own. If you cannot discuss a point in a good mood and behavior, I must say please do not reply. A Law Graduate or, I must say, a Master of Law must support their reply with some concrete evidence, or else they would make their own mockery in front of others.
Mr. Sajid, you are saying yourself to be an ESI committee member, but I feel surprised that you are not aware of the ESI Employer Guide wherein they have given a method of calculation of notional wages for piece-rated employees.
What I was pointing out were the provisions and the legal points. If you have the latest law from the SC, you may put it in the thread for the members to read.
Regards,
Always be cheerful and do not attract unpleasant conversations.
I