We have a manufacturing firm (Ltd - unlisted) since almost 30 years. The company is shutting down due to high competition and less profit. The labors have a union and are members of CITU. Most of the labor are working for around 20 years. What is the way to shut down the company and the liability of the company towards the labor.

From India, Guwahati
Dear Akshyagar,
Closure of a place of employment or part thereof is a subject matter dealt with by the Industrial Disputes Act,1947 in its Chapters V-A and V-B based on the no of workmen employed therein. Therefore, had you mentioned the total no. of employees employed in the Company in the cadre of workman as defined u/s 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act,1947 as on date or the average no per working day for the preceding twelve months, the answer could have been conveniently restricted to that extent. Anyway, let me try to present a brief answer with a request to go through the relevant sections of the Act and Rules for further details.
A) If the total no of workmen employed in the industry is less than 100:
The relevant section covering closure is sec.25-FFA. When the total no of workmen employed in the industry is 50 and above but less than 100 or so on average per working day in the preceding 12 months, the employer intending to close down the undertaking should serve a notice in the prescribed manner on the appropriate Government stating clearly the reasons for the intended closure prior to 60 days.
In addition, on the effective date of closure, the employer has to pay compensation to every workman who is in the service of the establishment for not less than one year as per sec.25-F of the Act as if he is retrenched. That is one month's notice or pay in lieu of and retrenchment compensation at the rate of 15 days average pay for every completed year of service or in part thereof in excess of six months.
B) If the total no. of workman employed in the industry is 100 or above:
The relevant section under the Act is sec.25-O which you can go through for complete details. In short, closure of an industrial undertaking under this section is subject to the prior sanction of the appropriate Government. 90 days before the intended date of closure, the employer has to submit an application in the prescribed manner seeking permission to close down the undertaking to the Govt and simultaneously serve copy of the application on the representative of the workmen/their unions. When such an application seeking permission for closure is received the appropriate Govt has to conduct an enquiry by affording opportunities of being heard to the employer, workmen and other interested persons and pass an orders in writing granting or refusing permission to close down the undertaking within a period of sixty days. IF no orders have been communicated by the Govt within 60 days from the date the application was made, the permission applied for would be deemed to have been granted after the expiry of the 60 days period.
If the permission to close down is granted or deemed to have been granted as the case be, every workman employed in the establishment before the date of application for closure would be entitled to compensation at the rate of 15 days average wages for every completed year of service or in part thereof in excess of six months.
Apart from the above mentioned closure compensation, the affected workman are entitled to other terminal benefits like gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act,1972, salary for the annual leave with wages or earned leave at credit as per the establishment-specific law applicable, proportionate bonus for the accounting year under the Payment of Bonus Act,1965 upto the date of closure.
In fact, no employer would prefer to close down an industrial undertaking just on account of temporary set backs experienced in the short run for at times closing down might be costlier and more cumbersome than revival. However, continued losses coupled with adverse market conditions may push the employer to the corner and he may decide to close down for reasons beyond his control. But it would not be a welcome decision for the employees as their livelihood suddenly becomes at stake and they would naturally decide to avert it by fighting tooth and nail or demand a hefty closure compensation. Therefore, it would be better for the management to negotiate with the union of workmen to arrive at an amicable Voluntary Separation Scheme and make the closure a peaceful and painless affair.

From India, Salem
Thank you sir, We have a total of 65 labor and the profit out of it is much less that what we will make just giving the Shed on land.
From India, Guwahati

About Us Advertise Contact Us
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2021 Cite.Co™