who is authorised or legal Performance reviewer - CiteHR
Dinesh Divekar
Business Mentor, Consultant And Trainer
Hr Proessional
+1 Other

Cite.Co is a repository of information created by your industry peers and experienced seniors sharing their experience and insights.
Join Us and help by adding your inputs. Contributions From Other Members Follow Below...
Please share me details incase if a employee has 2 or more supervisor consider as one sits in India with him & is approval manager & other sits in other states who will assign work.
Please let me no who is authorised to do the review legally or if any policy related to this pls share me.
Thanks in Advance

Dear Srirashmi,
Many times, because of the nature of the work, need for dual reporting arises. Most of the time one is functional reporting and another Admin one.
Imagine a situation wherein Head SCM of India operations reports to the Global Head of SCM. In such a case, Global Head will design the KRAs, issue work-related guidelines, will ensure that the work related to supplier selection or delivery of the material etc is as per the SOP.
On the another side, there could be another person heading for India Operations. Head SCM of India operations needs to report to him also. While he may not give directions related to purchase function but he will control basic requirements like leave, attendance etc. He might give guidelines to Head SCM of India Operations about the upcoming projects, local requirements if any, etc.
Dual reporting happens in MNCs for Finance, Customer Service, HR and so on.
Dinesh Divekar

Dear Dinesh,
Thanks for the info. Yes scenario is more r less the same what u explained. I need to know who can do the review is the functional manager or team manager or both with mutual agreement. Is any policy in india which explain about the eligibility if reviewer.

In this case, the territory boss will reivew it first and put his suggestion for consideration, final recommendation shall come from the functional boss, who seats in HQ.
Dear Srirashmi,
It is better if both the bosses decide on the KRAs of their reportee. Functional KRAs may be decided by the functional head and Admin reporting authority may decide about the requirement of local KRAs, if any. Nevertheless, it is important to consider that local authority allots work where the junior spends time but the consumption of his time does not get accounted.
Sometimes, managing two bosses is traumatic. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the junior does not get pulled apart in fulfilling expectations of both.
Dinesh Divekar

This discussion thread is closed. If you want to continue this discussion or have a follow up question, please post it on the network.
Add the url of this thread if you want to cite this discussion.

About Us Advertise Contact Us
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2020 Cite.Co™