A voluntary retirement scheme introduced by a company does not entitle an employee as a matter of right to the benefits of the scheme. Whether an employee should be allowed to retire in terms of the scheme is a decision that can be taken only by the employer, except in cases where the scheme itself provides for retirement to take effect when the notice period comes to an end. The Supreme Court stated this in the judgment, C V Francis versus Union of India.
In this case, a manager of the Steel Authority of India applied for the voluntary retirement scheme (VRS) and left the country to take up employment in the US. He did not join duty, and the application for VRS was not accepted. Consequently, his services were terminated. He challenged these actions in the Jharkhand High Court, which rejected his arguments. The Supreme Court dismissed his appeal.
Regards,
From India, Malappuram
Acknowledge(3)
Amend(0)
1446In this case, a manager of the Steel Authority of India applied for the voluntary retirement scheme (VRS) and left the country to take up employment in the US. He did not join duty, and the application for VRS was not accepted. Consequently, his services were terminated. He challenged these actions in the Jharkhand High Court, which rejected his arguments. The Supreme Court dismissed his appeal.
Regards,
From India, Malappuram
Acknowledge(3)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
Supreme court judgment on min wages (AIRFREIGHT).pd f
Recent Judgment of Honble Supreme Court on Wage eligible for contribution.pp tx