In the past week, social feeds and HR forums exploded with discussion around the Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025, introduced by an MP in the Lok Sabha. The proposed law (still under consideration) seeks to make it unlawful for employers to penalise employees for ignoring work calls, messages, or emails outside official working hours — a digital work-life boundary that many Indian white-collar workers have long sought. This Bill would require organisations to publish clear policies on after-hours communication, prohibit retaliation against employees who exercise the disconnect right, and could create an Employees’ Welfare Authority to oversee compliance and handle complaints. The buzz on r/indiaworks and LinkedIn India over the past five days has made this one of the most talked-about HR topics this quarter, especially given rising burnout and stress claims in tech and services sectors.
The emotional response from employees has been intense and layered. Many professionals expressed a deep sense of validation, saying that they’ve long felt guilt or fear for unresponded late messages, particularly in organisations where “always-on” culture is the unspoken norm. Stories poured in of health issues, strained family relationships, and quiet resignations linked to constant digital pressure. Yet some middle managers voiced anxiety and pushback, worrying that strict disconnect rights might fracture client expectations, slow decision cycles, and complicate global coordination. HR professionals are caught between empathy for employee wellbeing and pressure to maintain productivity, leading to debates about whether the Bill would empower staff or inadvertently handcuff fast-pace sectors. The collective tone reveals a workplace culture in flux — one where the psychological costs of digital overload are now visible and painful rather than invisible and shrugged off.
From a compliance and leadership standpoint, if the Right to Disconnect Bill passes, it would mark a paradigm shift in Indian employment law, similar in significance to statutory weekly offs or maternity leaves. Though still in draft, the Bill’s implications touch on employer obligations under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, and could eventually require HR policy overhauls — setting formal hours of engagement, disciplinary boundaries, and complaint resolution frameworks. Leaders must anticipate that this won’t be just a legal checkbox but a governance and culture issue that interacts with employee contracts, performance appraisal norms, and digital communication protocols. Firms may need to introduce new metrics for compliance reporting, train managers on respectful after-hours boundary setting, and instill clearer definitions of “official working hours” across geographies and functions. For compliance officers, the coming months could mean drafting policies, updating handbooks, and engaging legal counsel to ready organisations for statutory mandates that once seemed foreign to Indian workplaces.
What safeguards should HR build into disconnect policies so employees feel safe to enforce them?
How should companies measure productivity if after-hours responses are no longer a performance signal?
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
7The emotional response from employees has been intense and layered. Many professionals expressed a deep sense of validation, saying that they’ve long felt guilt or fear for unresponded late messages, particularly in organisations where “always-on” culture is the unspoken norm. Stories poured in of health issues, strained family relationships, and quiet resignations linked to constant digital pressure. Yet some middle managers voiced anxiety and pushback, worrying that strict disconnect rights might fracture client expectations, slow decision cycles, and complicate global coordination. HR professionals are caught between empathy for employee wellbeing and pressure to maintain productivity, leading to debates about whether the Bill would empower staff or inadvertently handcuff fast-pace sectors. The collective tone reveals a workplace culture in flux — one where the psychological costs of digital overload are now visible and painful rather than invisible and shrugged off.
From a compliance and leadership standpoint, if the Right to Disconnect Bill passes, it would mark a paradigm shift in Indian employment law, similar in significance to statutory weekly offs or maternity leaves. Though still in draft, the Bill’s implications touch on employer obligations under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, and could eventually require HR policy overhauls — setting formal hours of engagement, disciplinary boundaries, and complaint resolution frameworks. Leaders must anticipate that this won’t be just a legal checkbox but a governance and culture issue that interacts with employee contracts, performance appraisal norms, and digital communication protocols. Firms may need to introduce new metrics for compliance reporting, train managers on respectful after-hours boundary setting, and instill clearer definitions of “official working hours” across geographies and functions. For compliance officers, the coming months could mean drafting policies, updating handbooks, and engaging legal counsel to ready organisations for statutory mandates that once seemed foreign to Indian workplaces.
What safeguards should HR build into disconnect policies so employees feel safe to enforce them?
How should companies measure productivity if after-hours responses are no longer a performance signal?
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The Right to Disconnect Bill, if passed, will indeed bring significant changes to the Indian workplace. HR professionals will play a critical role in ensuring a smooth transition.
1. To safeguard employees' rights, HR should develop clear disconnect policies that define 'official working hours' and 'after-hours'. These policies should explicitly state that employees are not obligated to respond to work-related communication during their personal time. The policy should also include a non-retaliation clause, ensuring that employees who exercise their right to disconnect are not penalised.
2. HR should also establish a robust grievance redressal mechanism. This could involve setting up an internal committee to handle complaints related to the enforcement of the disconnect policy. Employees should be made aware of this mechanism and encouraged to report any violations.
3. Training sessions should be conducted for managers and employees alike. Managers need to understand the importance of respecting employees' personal time and how to manage their teams effectively without infringing on this right. Employees should be educated about their rights and how to enforce them.
4. As for measuring productivity, companies should shift their focus from time-based metrics to output-based metrics. This means assessing employees based on the quality and quantity of their work, rather than the number of hours they put in. This approach not only respects the right to disconnect but also promotes a results-oriented work culture.
5. Finally, HR should regularly review and update these policies to ensure they remain relevant and effective. They should also be open to feedback from employees and make necessary adjustments based on their input.
In conclusion, the Right to Disconnect Bill presents an opportunity for companies to reassess their work culture and practices. By implementing clear policies and promoting a healthy work-life balance, companies can not only comply with the law but also enhance employee satisfaction and productivity.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
1. To safeguard employees' rights, HR should develop clear disconnect policies that define 'official working hours' and 'after-hours'. These policies should explicitly state that employees are not obligated to respond to work-related communication during their personal time. The policy should also include a non-retaliation clause, ensuring that employees who exercise their right to disconnect are not penalised.
2. HR should also establish a robust grievance redressal mechanism. This could involve setting up an internal committee to handle complaints related to the enforcement of the disconnect policy. Employees should be made aware of this mechanism and encouraged to report any violations.
3. Training sessions should be conducted for managers and employees alike. Managers need to understand the importance of respecting employees' personal time and how to manage their teams effectively without infringing on this right. Employees should be educated about their rights and how to enforce them.
4. As for measuring productivity, companies should shift their focus from time-based metrics to output-based metrics. This means assessing employees based on the quality and quantity of their work, rather than the number of hours they put in. This approach not only respects the right to disconnect but also promotes a results-oriented work culture.
5. Finally, HR should regularly review and update these policies to ensure they remain relevant and effective. They should also be open to feedback from employees and make necessary adjustments based on their input.
In conclusion, the Right to Disconnect Bill presents an opportunity for companies to reassess their work culture and practices. By implementing clear policies and promoting a healthy work-life balance, companies can not only comply with the law but also enhance employee satisfaction and productivity.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
Innovation in HR by Total Reward Optimisation For Employee Retention & Enhance Productivity.pd f
Employee Appraisal Form new.doc