On 11 December 2025, fresh explainers on the newly effective Labour Code 2025 spelt out a reality that many HR heads had been warning about: for a large segment of new hires, take-home salaries are likely to drop, even if CTCs look attractive on paper. The reason lies in the new wage definition, which requires that “wages” form at least 50% of the total cost-to-company. Where companies previously kept basic and dearness allowance artificially low and pumped the rest into allowances, they must now rebalance. That means higher mandatory contributions to PF, gratuity and other social-security benefits based on a larger wage base, and, in many cases, 5–10% higher long-term salary outgo for employers — but with less cash in hand each month for employees.
The Economic Times
For employees, especially younger professionals and job seekers, this feels emotionally confusing. They are told the new regime is “worker-friendly” because it boosts long-term benefits, yet the immediate experience is a smaller net credit in their bank account at month-end. Those supporting families, paying EMIs or servicing education loans may resent being pushed into forced savings when their present financial pressure is already intense. HR teams report a spike in questions about why “salary has gone down” despite increments or new offers, and recruiters find that explaining CTC versus take-home versus retirement benefits eats up significant time in offer discussions. There is also a trust question: after years of companies using complex salary structures to manage costs, many workers suspect that “compliance adjustments” are just another way to squeeze them unless explained transparently.
From a compliance and leadership standpoint, the new wage rule is not optional; it fundamentally rewires how compensation must be designed. Organisations that continue with low-basic structures risk future PF and gratuity liabilities, penalties and disputes if regulators or courts deem their old designs non-compliant. Compensation committees and CHROs will need to rebuild salary templates, especially for sales-heavy or allowance-heavy roles, and clearly document the rationale. Offer letters, HRMS fields and payroll engines must all reflect the revised wage breakdown. This is also a governance moment: boards can insist that pay structures be not just legally compliant but also intelligible to employees, with clear illustrations of how social-security benefits accumulate over time. Done well, HR can reposition this shift as part of a more mature, security-focused employment proposition rather than a stealth pay cut.
How should HR explain these wage-structure changes to new hires so they feel informed, not cheated, when they see their first payslip?
What balance should companies strike between long-term social security and short-term take-home pay in an economy where many workers live month to month?
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
7The Economic Times
For employees, especially younger professionals and job seekers, this feels emotionally confusing. They are told the new regime is “worker-friendly” because it boosts long-term benefits, yet the immediate experience is a smaller net credit in their bank account at month-end. Those supporting families, paying EMIs or servicing education loans may resent being pushed into forced savings when their present financial pressure is already intense. HR teams report a spike in questions about why “salary has gone down” despite increments or new offers, and recruiters find that explaining CTC versus take-home versus retirement benefits eats up significant time in offer discussions. There is also a trust question: after years of companies using complex salary structures to manage costs, many workers suspect that “compliance adjustments” are just another way to squeeze them unless explained transparently.
From a compliance and leadership standpoint, the new wage rule is not optional; it fundamentally rewires how compensation must be designed. Organisations that continue with low-basic structures risk future PF and gratuity liabilities, penalties and disputes if regulators or courts deem their old designs non-compliant. Compensation committees and CHROs will need to rebuild salary templates, especially for sales-heavy or allowance-heavy roles, and clearly document the rationale. Offer letters, HRMS fields and payroll engines must all reflect the revised wage breakdown. This is also a governance moment: boards can insist that pay structures be not just legally compliant but also intelligible to employees, with clear illustrations of how social-security benefits accumulate over time. Done well, HR can reposition this shift as part of a more mature, security-focused employment proposition rather than a stealth pay cut.
How should HR explain these wage-structure changes to new hires so they feel informed, not cheated, when they see their first payslip?
What balance should companies strike between long-term social security and short-term take-home pay in an economy where many workers live month to month?
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The new Labour Code 2025 has indeed brought about a significant shift in the wage structure, and it's crucial for HR professionals to communicate these changes effectively to employees. Here's a step-by-step guide on how to do this:
1. Explain the New Wage Structure: Start by explaining the new wage definition and how it impacts the overall salary structure. Make it clear that the "wages" now form at least 50% of the total cost-to-company, leading to higher contributions to PF, gratuity, and other social security benefits.
2. Clarify the Impact on Take-home Salary: It's important to clarify that while the CTC might remain the same or even appear higher, the take-home salary might decrease due to increased deductions. Use simple examples to illustrate this point.
3. Highlight the Long-term Benefits: Emphasize that the new structure is designed to enhance long-term financial security. Explain how increased contributions to PF and gratuity will lead to a larger corpus upon retirement.
4. Address Concerns Transparently: Be prepared to address questions and concerns about the reduced take-home pay. Encourage employees to voice their concerns and answer their queries transparently.
5. Provide Detailed Breakdown: Provide a detailed breakdown of the salary structure in the offer letters. This should include the basic pay, allowances, deductions, and net take-home pay.
As for the balance between long-term social security and short-term take-home pay, it's a delicate one. Companies need to comply with the new wage rule, but they also need to understand the financial pressures their employees might be facing. It might be beneficial to offer financial counseling sessions to help employees manage their finances better. Additionally, companies could consider other non-monetary benefits or perks that can help alleviate some of the immediate financial pressures on the employees.
Remember, transparency and open communication are key in such scenarios. The more informed the employees are, the less likely they are to feel cheated or confused.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
1. Explain the New Wage Structure: Start by explaining the new wage definition and how it impacts the overall salary structure. Make it clear that the "wages" now form at least 50% of the total cost-to-company, leading to higher contributions to PF, gratuity, and other social security benefits.
2. Clarify the Impact on Take-home Salary: It's important to clarify that while the CTC might remain the same or even appear higher, the take-home salary might decrease due to increased deductions. Use simple examples to illustrate this point.
3. Highlight the Long-term Benefits: Emphasize that the new structure is designed to enhance long-term financial security. Explain how increased contributions to PF and gratuity will lead to a larger corpus upon retirement.
4. Address Concerns Transparently: Be prepared to address questions and concerns about the reduced take-home pay. Encourage employees to voice their concerns and answer their queries transparently.
5. Provide Detailed Breakdown: Provide a detailed breakdown of the salary structure in the offer letters. This should include the basic pay, allowances, deductions, and net take-home pay.
As for the balance between long-term social security and short-term take-home pay, it's a delicate one. Companies need to comply with the new wage rule, but they also need to understand the financial pressures their employees might be facing. It might be beneficial to offer financial counseling sessions to help employees manage their finances better. Additionally, companies could consider other non-monetary benefits or perks that can help alleviate some of the immediate financial pressures on the employees.
Remember, transparency and open communication are key in such scenarios. The more informed the employees are, the less likely they are to feel cheated or confused.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
SBT Vs Asst. Labour Commissioner- Gratuity dismissed employee-LTS.PD F
Wage Breakdown Structure.xls
Wage Code Bill - Summary.docx