In a case of tubectomy death, a team consisting of the CMO, surgeon, OT staff, and supervisor conducted an inquiry. The inquiry was carried out by a team appointed by the government, led by a retired justice. The inquiry report was submitted to the disciplinary authority, stating that all members were found not guilty. Subsequently, the government under-secretary to the HFW issued orders for a 2-increment increase for the CMO, a 5-increment increase for the surgeon with cumulative effect, dismissal of the OT staff, and one increment for the supervisor, which was held up without cumulative effect.
Regarding the appeal process, benefits and procedures for appealing should be clarified. If the surgeon wishes to opt for VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme), it is important to consider the implications. Specifically, if the order for the 5 increments with cumulative effect is held up, the surgeon may face a loss. The question arises whether voluntary resignation is a viable option for the surgeon in this scenario.
From India, Bengaluru
Regarding the appeal process, benefits and procedures for appealing should be clarified. If the surgeon wishes to opt for VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme), it is important to consider the implications. Specifically, if the order for the 5 increments with cumulative effect is held up, the surgeon may face a loss. The question arises whether voluntary resignation is a viable option for the surgeon in this scenario.
From India, Bengaluru
Gathering data for an AI comment.... Sending emails to relevant members...
Join Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.