In a case of tubectomy death, a team consisting of the CMO, surgeon, OT staff, and supervisor conducted an inquiry. The inquiry was carried out by a team appointed by the government, led by a retired justice. The inquiry report was submitted to the disciplinary authority, stating that all members were found not guilty. Subsequently, the government under-secretary to the HFW issued orders for a 2-increment increase for the CMO, a 5-increment increase for the surgeon with cumulative effect, dismissal of the OT staff, and one increment for the supervisor, which was held up without cumulative effect.

Regarding the appeal process, benefits and procedures for appealing should be clarified. If the surgeon wishes to opt for VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme), it is important to consider the implications. Specifically, if the order for the 5 increments with cumulative effect is held up, the surgeon may face a loss. The question arises whether voluntary resignation is a viable option for the surgeon in this scenario.

From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

In Karnataka government health services, if we have completed 15 years of service and are willing to opt for voluntary retirement, what are the benefits? What will be the loss if a penalty of five increments is withheld with cumulative effect in this situation?
From India, Bengaluru
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Join Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.







Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.