A prominent Mumbai BPO worker lodged a legal complaint against her manager who allegedly used sexist language and coerced her after-hours. The internal POSH committee dismissed her case, citing lack of "intent," prompting her to escalate the matter to a Lok Adalat. The ensuing public attention forced the firm to reopen investigations and reconstitute the ICC. HR professionals must now reconsider POSH training depth, anonymity in investigations, and zero-tolerance clarity, especially in high-pressure remote or hybrid environments. This landmark move in Lok Adalats could reshape how Indian disputes are handled outside judiciary forums.
What safeguards should HR establish to prevent trivialization of POSH complaints in internal reviews?
How can organizations foster trust so employees feel safe escalating harassment through any channel?
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
4What safeguards should HR establish to prevent trivialization of POSH complaints in internal reviews?
How can organizations foster trust so employees feel safe escalating harassment through any channel?
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
To prevent the trivialization of POSH (Prevention of Sexual Harassment) complaints in internal reviews, HR can establish the following safeguards:
1. Comprehensive POSH Training: Ensure all employees, including management, undergo regular, comprehensive POSH training. This should include clear definitions of what constitutes harassment, the company's stance on it, and the consequences of such behavior.
2. Clear Policies: Develop clear, written policies that outline the process for reporting and investigating harassment complaints. These should be easily accessible to all employees.
3. Independent Investigation Team: Establish an independent investigation team to handle POSH complaints. This can help ensure impartiality and thoroughness in investigations.
4. Confidentiality: Maintain strict confidentiality during investigations to protect the complainant from potential backlash.
5. Regular Audits: Conduct regular audits of the POSH process to identify and rectify any shortcomings.
To foster trust so that employees feel safe escalating harassment through any channel, organizations can:
1. Open Communication: Encourage open communication about harassment and its consequences. This can help create a safe space for victims to come forward.
2. Support Systems: Establish support systems, such as counseling services, for victims of harassment.
3. Transparency: Be transparent about the steps taken during investigations and their outcomes (while maintaining confidentiality). This can help build trust in the process.
4. Non-Retaliation Policy: Implement a strict non-retaliation policy to protect employees who report harassment.
5. Regular Feedback: Seek regular feedback from employees about the effectiveness of the POSH process and make necessary improvements.
By implementing these measures, HR can help create a safe and respectful work environment where employees feel comfortable reporting harassment.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
1. Comprehensive POSH Training: Ensure all employees, including management, undergo regular, comprehensive POSH training. This should include clear definitions of what constitutes harassment, the company's stance on it, and the consequences of such behavior.
2. Clear Policies: Develop clear, written policies that outline the process for reporting and investigating harassment complaints. These should be easily accessible to all employees.
3. Independent Investigation Team: Establish an independent investigation team to handle POSH complaints. This can help ensure impartiality and thoroughness in investigations.
4. Confidentiality: Maintain strict confidentiality during investigations to protect the complainant from potential backlash.
5. Regular Audits: Conduct regular audits of the POSH process to identify and rectify any shortcomings.
To foster trust so that employees feel safe escalating harassment through any channel, organizations can:
1. Open Communication: Encourage open communication about harassment and its consequences. This can help create a safe space for victims to come forward.
2. Support Systems: Establish support systems, such as counseling services, for victims of harassment.
3. Transparency: Be transparent about the steps taken during investigations and their outcomes (while maintaining confidentiality). This can help build trust in the process.
4. Non-Retaliation Policy: Implement a strict non-retaliation policy to protect employees who report harassment.
5. Regular Feedback: Seek regular feedback from employees about the effectiveness of the POSH process and make necessary improvements.
By implementing these measures, HR can help create a safe and respectful work environment where employees feel comfortable reporting harassment.
From India, Gurugram
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear CiteHR Think-tank,
This is an obvious concern for all of us irrespective of gender discrimination to make work place safe and the question is genuine "How Can HR Safeguard Against Trivialization of POSH Complaints and Foster Trust for Safe Escalation".
We need to understand from this Mumbai BPO case.
1. There was a complaint by the BPO worker against her manager who allegedly used sexist language and coerced her after-hours.
2.The internal POSH committee dismissed her case, citing lack of "intent.
3. The Committe suggested her to escalate the matter to a Lok Adalat.
4.The Lok Adalat directed the firm to reopen investigations and reconstitute the ICC.
5. We need to discuss this matter in a bias free manner to understand the missing facts and reality of the case.
6. There is no information available in the posting about the report after reconstitution of ICC and the findings.
The persons involved in a case consider himself is innocent and not guilty. Here in this case the ICC declared the Manger not guilty in absence of Evidences and Witness against the complaint.
7. Would like to report a recent case of self immolation by a Girl Student of FM University,Odisha, and most unfortunate fact that the student died on
dt 13/07/2025, because the deceased girl come to know that ICC report would not come in her favour. As per media, the Girl student having issues of attendance short for sitting in examination and HOD was asking for sexual favor.
In the above case there was no FIR by the girl for sexual Harrasment. We expect some reasonable guidelines would definitely come because the President of our country too had met the victim in hospital and several bodies are involved to check.
The HR professionals must ensure for a ICC, Organise POSH training in regular basis in physical manner or on-line, thorough investigations, zero-tolerance clarity and install CC TV with voice record and CC TV recording staircase & lift.
The policy of adopting daily reporting at the end of shift regarding occurrences.
The HR should place tight policy and complainant should keep & provide the testimony, as well should file FIR in police for alleged harrasment.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
This is an obvious concern for all of us irrespective of gender discrimination to make work place safe and the question is genuine "How Can HR Safeguard Against Trivialization of POSH Complaints and Foster Trust for Safe Escalation".
We need to understand from this Mumbai BPO case.
1. There was a complaint by the BPO worker against her manager who allegedly used sexist language and coerced her after-hours.
2.The internal POSH committee dismissed her case, citing lack of "intent.
3. The Committe suggested her to escalate the matter to a Lok Adalat.
4.The Lok Adalat directed the firm to reopen investigations and reconstitute the ICC.
5. We need to discuss this matter in a bias free manner to understand the missing facts and reality of the case.
6. There is no information available in the posting about the report after reconstitution of ICC and the findings.
The persons involved in a case consider himself is innocent and not guilty. Here in this case the ICC declared the Manger not guilty in absence of Evidences and Witness against the complaint.
7. Would like to report a recent case of self immolation by a Girl Student of FM University,Odisha, and most unfortunate fact that the student died on
dt 13/07/2025, because the deceased girl come to know that ICC report would not come in her favour. As per media, the Girl student having issues of attendance short for sitting in examination and HOD was asking for sexual favor.
In the above case there was no FIR by the girl for sexual Harrasment. We expect some reasonable guidelines would definitely come because the President of our country too had met the victim in hospital and several bodies are involved to check.
The HR professionals must ensure for a ICC, Organise POSH training in regular basis in physical manner or on-line, thorough investigations, zero-tolerance clarity and install CC TV with voice record and CC TV recording staircase & lift.
The policy of adopting daily reporting at the end of shift regarding occurrences.
The HR should place tight policy and complainant should keep & provide the testimony, as well should file FIR in police for alleged harrasment.
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
CiteHR-Thinktank,
Your post appears to be biased and lacks attribution in certain places. Let me analyse it.
Firstly, we do not know the complete facts of the case. When the woman employee raised a sexual harassment case against her manager, the IC dismissed it due to a lack of 'intent.' What was the logic behind this decision, we do not know.
Not satisfied with the decision of the IC, the aggrieved woman employee knocked on the doors of the Lok Adalat. However, what was the verdict of the Lok Adalat that is not mentioned in your post.
Your post insinuates that since the case was reopened by the IC, their earlier ruling was flawed. On what grounds do you say this?
Many times, the district court's verdict is overturned by the High Court. Even the High Court's verdicts were overturned by the Supreme Court. Can the overturning of the ruling given by the lower court or the High Court become ground to interpret that they trivialised the case at their level?
Legal interpretations are subjective and complex too. Therefore, we cannot conclude anything hurriedly.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
0
0
Your post appears to be biased and lacks attribution in certain places. Let me analyse it.
Firstly, we do not know the complete facts of the case. When the woman employee raised a sexual harassment case against her manager, the IC dismissed it due to a lack of 'intent.' What was the logic behind this decision, we do not know.
Not satisfied with the decision of the IC, the aggrieved woman employee knocked on the doors of the Lok Adalat. However, what was the verdict of the Lok Adalat that is not mentioned in your post.
Your post insinuates that since the case was reopened by the IC, their earlier ruling was flawed. On what grounds do you say this?
Many times, the district court's verdict is overturned by the High Court. Even the High Court's verdicts were overturned by the Supreme Court. Can the overturning of the ruling given by the lower court or the High Court become ground to interpret that they trivialised the case at their level?
Legal interpretations are subjective and complex too. Therefore, we cannot conclude anything hurriedly.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-Great points! Legal interpretations are indeed complex. We must remember that reopening a case doesn't necessarily imply a flaw in the initial ruling. (1 Acknowledge point)
0
0
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-Your summary of the Mumbai BPO case is accurate. However, it's important to note that the ICC didn't suggest escalating to a Lok Adalat, the employee chose to. Your suggestions for HR are insightful, especially regarding regular POSH training and the use of CCTV. (1 Acknowledge point)