Hi Team,
We are hiring interns in our company. These interns will undergo a 6-month internship as part of their curriculum, which is mandatory for students from Deemed universities. We have decided to provide them with a stipend of INR 10,000. Do we need to deduct their PF/ESI?
From India, Jaipur
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
We are hiring interns in our company. These interns will undergo a 6-month internship as part of their curriculum, which is mandatory for students from Deemed universities. We have decided to provide them with a stipend of INR 10,000. Do we need to deduct their PF/ESI?
From India, Jaipur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
No. Student interns are not covered by either PF and ESI Acts.Even apprentices under the Apprentices Act are not covered by the said Acts. B.Saikumar HR & Labour Law Advisor Navi Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
1931From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
Coverage Under the ESI Act, 1948
The use of terms such as interns, trainers, learners, probationers, casuals, or temporary employees is irrelevant concerning coverage under the ESI Act, 1948.
Exemptions Under the Apprentice Act, 1961
Only individuals engaged under the provisions of the Apprentice Act, 1961 (and that too only for periods as specified in the said Act) are not covered under the ESI Act due to the provisions contained in section 2(9) of the Act. The Act was amended in 2010 to provide clarity on the coverage position. In the EPF & MP Act, the situation may be slightly different since the Act also acknowledges the position concerning the "Standing Orders of the establishment."
From India, Noida
Acknowledge(2)
Amend(0)
The use of terms such as interns, trainers, learners, probationers, casuals, or temporary employees is irrelevant concerning coverage under the ESI Act, 1948.
Exemptions Under the Apprentice Act, 1961
Only individuals engaged under the provisions of the Apprentice Act, 1961 (and that too only for periods as specified in the said Act) are not covered under the ESI Act due to the provisions contained in section 2(9) of the Act. The Act was amended in 2010 to provide clarity on the coverage position. In the EPF & MP Act, the situation may be slightly different since the Act also acknowledges the position concerning the "Standing Orders of the establishment."
From India, Noida
Acknowledge(2)Amend(0)
Clarification on PF Act for Student Interns
A student pursuing an internship as part of their academic curriculum stands on a different footing from trainees appointed under standing orders or apprentices appointed under the Apprentices Act. They continue to be students for all intents and purposes, not employees. This trend in skill development as part of the academic curriculum is currently being followed by many educational institutes and B-Schools.
Therefore, keeping this trend in view and to encourage it in the interests of students' futures, the PF department itself clarified in their circular no. coord/40(5) 2015/Misc/clarification dated 12-10-2015 that such students will not be treated as employees. Consequently, the stipend provided to them will not be treated as wages for the purpose of the PF Act, meaning they are excluded from the coverage of the PF Act. Hope this helps.
Regards, B. Saikumar
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(4)
Amend(0)
A student pursuing an internship as part of their academic curriculum stands on a different footing from trainees appointed under standing orders or apprentices appointed under the Apprentices Act. They continue to be students for all intents and purposes, not employees. This trend in skill development as part of the academic curriculum is currently being followed by many educational institutes and B-Schools.
Therefore, keeping this trend in view and to encourage it in the interests of students' futures, the PF department itself clarified in their circular no. coord/40(5) 2015/Misc/clarification dated 12-10-2015 that such students will not be treated as employees. Consequently, the stipend provided to them will not be treated as wages for the purpose of the PF Act, meaning they are excluded from the coverage of the PF Act. Hope this helps.
Regards, B. Saikumar
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(4)Amend(0)
Nicely explained, sir.
If they are appointed as an intern in the middle of the curriculum, then this will be applicable. What if they are appointed after completing their course? Even educational institutions are not providing any letters as they are requesting internships. How can it be considered part of the curriculum? Many companies hire freshers as interns and later offer them permanent roles.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
If they are appointed as an intern in the middle of the curriculum, then this will be applicable. What if they are appointed after completing their course? Even educational institutions are not providing any letters as they are requesting internships. How can it be considered part of the curriculum? Many companies hire freshers as interns and later offer them permanent roles.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
Yes, Jeeva, then the issue of whether they are interns falling within the purview of exemption under the respective Acts or employees attracting the applicability of them needs to be decided by the facts of each case. Factors such as whether they are appointed under standing orders or the Apprentices Act, the nature of their engagement, the nature of remuneration, and the tenure/length of their engagement will determine the issue.
B. Saikumar
HR & Labour Law Advisor
Navi Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
B. Saikumar
HR & Labour Law Advisor
Navi Mumbai
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
Classification of Interns and Apprentices
Rightly said. It is on this basis that the Madras High Court, in Ramanarayan Mills Ltd Vs RPFC, has stated that apprentices who are treated like regular workers, in terms of both numbers and tasks performed, and who also receive production incentives, should not be classified as apprentices. This is the case even if there exists a provision in the certified Standing Orders of the company to hire apprentices, and such apprentices are excluded from EPF coverage.
Consequently, if you have several interns to whom you provide stipends, they may be regarded as regular workers, potentially hired for a limited period. If the objective is to enable students to undergo training as part of their curriculum, then why offer a stipend? Let them work without receiving any stipend.
Regards, Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(3)
Amend(0)
Rightly said. It is on this basis that the Madras High Court, in Ramanarayan Mills Ltd Vs RPFC, has stated that apprentices who are treated like regular workers, in terms of both numbers and tasks performed, and who also receive production incentives, should not be classified as apprentices. This is the case even if there exists a provision in the certified Standing Orders of the company to hire apprentices, and such apprentices are excluded from EPF coverage.
Consequently, if you have several interns to whom you provide stipends, they may be regarded as regular workers, potentially hired for a limited period. If the objective is to enable students to undergo training as part of their curriculum, then why offer a stipend? Let them work without receiving any stipend.
Regards, Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(3)Amend(0)
Internship and Labor Law Applicability
Interns hired by the querist are part of their study or syllabus. This internship is for a specific period of six months as included in their curriculum. Therefore, there is no employee-employer relationship between the interns and the party hiring them.
For the applicability of any of the labor laws, the existence of an employee-employer relationship is a must. In this case, as there is no employee-employer relationship, they cannot be covered under EPF and ESIS. The querist should establish that there is no employee-employer relationship between both parties.
Regards
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
Interns hired by the querist are part of their study or syllabus. This internship is for a specific period of six months as included in their curriculum. Therefore, there is no employee-employer relationship between the interns and the party hiring them.
For the applicability of any of the labor laws, the existence of an employee-employer relationship is a must. In this case, as there is no employee-employer relationship, they cannot be covered under EPF and ESIS. The querist should establish that there is no employee-employer relationship between both parties.
Regards
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(1)Amend(0)
Intern / stipend / apprentice worker are mandatory to covered under PF & ESIC??
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
PF & ESI.zip
Presentation PF&ESI.ppt
Exp.and esi pf mis format.xls
CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-The information provided in the user reply is correct according to the circular no.coord/40(5) 2015/Misc/clarification issued by the P.F dept. Well done! (1 Acknowledge point)