Understanding PF Contribution Rates
I had an interview at a reputed company, and the HR manager asked me a question related to PF. The question was why there is a 12% contribution from both the employee and employer sides, and why not 10% from either side. Please provide me with the exact reason.
With regards,
Paras Thakur
From United States, Ashburn
I had an interview at a reputed company, and the HR manager asked me a question related to PF. The question was why there is a 12% contribution from both the employee and employer sides, and why not 10% from either side. Please provide me with the exact reason.
With regards,
Paras Thakur
From United States, Ashburn
Employee: 12%
Employer: 13.61%
Contribution:
- 3.67% = Provident Fund (A/c No.1)
- 8.33% = Pension Fund (A/c No.10)
- 0.5% = EDLIS - Employees Direct Linked Insurance Scheme (A/c No.21)
Administrative Charges:
- 1.10% of emoluments = Provident Fund (A/c No.2)
- 0.01% of emoluments = EDLIS (A/c No.22)
Total: 25.61%
From India, New Delhi
Employer: 13.61%
Contribution:
- 3.67% = Provident Fund (A/c No.1)
- 8.33% = Pension Fund (A/c No.10)
- 0.5% = EDLIS - Employees Direct Linked Insurance Scheme (A/c No.21)
Administrative Charges:
- 1.10% of emoluments = Provident Fund (A/c No.2)
- 0.01% of emoluments = EDLIS (A/c No.22)
Total: 25.61%
From India, New Delhi
Dear Sir i know these contribution as u have written but question is not related to contribution but it is related to the reason behind of fixation of 12%. Plz kindly let me know.... Regards paras
From United States, Ashburn
From United States, Ashburn
The answer is ,12% is decided by the govt.It can increase it or decrease it. Varghese Mathew 9961266966
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
The Origin and Evolution of the EPF Scheme
The EPF scheme was originally envisaged as a savings plan that would be useful for the workforce at the time of their retirement. Since there were no other facilities like postal savings, LIC, or banking existing at that time, and most of the employees were not educated to keep savings, it was thought that out of one year's earnings, one should provide a month's wages as savings for old age (i.e., 8.33%). The percentage was subsequently increased to 12% in stages. Various ILO conventions have also influenced this regard. Full details can be understood by reading about the Trade Union movement in the pre-independence period and the preambles of various welfare-oriented acts enacted at that time.
Regards,
M.Venkatraghavan
From India, Selam
The EPF scheme was originally envisaged as a savings plan that would be useful for the workforce at the time of their retirement. Since there were no other facilities like postal savings, LIC, or banking existing at that time, and most of the employees were not educated to keep savings, it was thought that out of one year's earnings, one should provide a month's wages as savings for old age (i.e., 8.33%). The percentage was subsequently increased to 12% in stages. Various ILO conventions have also influenced this regard. Full details can be understood by reading about the Trade Union movement in the pre-independence period and the preambles of various welfare-oriented acts enacted at that time.
Regards,
M.Venkatraghavan
From India, Selam
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.