I am associated with a small IT organization with around 35 employees. Out of them, the CEO, one Delivery Manager, 2 Project Managers, HR Manager, Account Executive, 2 Group Leads (1 Development & 1 QA), 3 QA team members, and the rest are Software Engineers and Senior Software Engineers. Until now, everything was going fine, but with time, we can see that this simple structure is not working for us anymore. We are unable to promote people as there is a lack of positions. For example, a person is technically very sound with around 4-5 years of experience, but we cannot promote them to a Group Lead since we already have one person in that role. The individual in question is working well independently but has not been assigned a team to lead. Therefore, to provide a clear growth path for all employees, we have decided to restructure our designations.
Current Structure:
- 2-4 years: Software Engineers/QA Engineers
- 4 years and above: Senior Software Engineers/Senior QA Engineers
- 5 years+ experience, minimum 3 years with our company, and leading a team independently: Group Lead (Development/QA)
- 7+ years experience and managing multiple projects: Project Manager
Could you please provide insights into the designation structure of a standard company?
Thanks in advance,
Sunetra
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
3Current Structure:
- 2-4 years: Software Engineers/QA Engineers
- 4 years and above: Senior Software Engineers/Senior QA Engineers
- 5 years+ experience, minimum 3 years with our company, and leading a team independently: Group Lead (Development/QA)
- 7+ years experience and managing multiple projects: Project Manager
Could you please provide insights into the designation structure of a standard company?
Thanks in advance,
Sunetra
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Understanding Individual Motives and Creating New Ranks
1. The RSI index will help you understand the motives of an individual. Then, create new ranks such as subject matter experts and coordinators.
The Importance of Using an OD Tool
2. Using an OD tool is important. For example, COPC suggests creating an intermediary rank of trainer between a star performer and manager to enable transformation. Otherwise, it may lead to failure.
Job Evaluation Methods
3. Utilize a method of job evaluation like the Hay point factor to calculate job scores for each position description. Finalize ranks only when job content varies significantly or scores differ; otherwise, consider abandoning changes.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
1. The RSI index will help you understand the motives of an individual. Then, create new ranks such as subject matter experts and coordinators.
The Importance of Using an OD Tool
2. Using an OD tool is important. For example, COPC suggests creating an intermediary rank of trainer between a star performer and manager to enable transformation. Otherwise, it may lead to failure.
Job Evaluation Methods
3. Utilize a method of job evaluation like the Hay point factor to calculate job scores for each position description. Finalize ranks only when job content varies significantly or scores differ; otherwise, consider abandoning changes.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thank you, Mr. Rana, for your kind explanation. Actually, I am aware of the method, but I am looking for the common hierarchy in software companies, like the positions you can say.
Thanks & Regards,
Sunetra
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Thanks & Regards,
Sunetra
From India, Calcutta
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Sunetra, I have worked with India’s 3rd largest company HCL. my advise remains the same, one size doesnt fit all.
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I'm not from an IT firm, but I would still like to share my view. When we hire a candidate, we as HR should structure a growth plan so that we can overcome such situations. This concept will apply to firms of all sizes, including small, medium, and large firms.
Proposed Structure
Based on my experience, I would like to propose the following structure:
Experience Level | Designation | Category
Fresher | Trainee-Engineer
1-2 yrs | Junior or Assistant Engineer
2-4 yrs | Engineer
Staff Level
4-7 yrs | Senior Engineer
7-10 yrs | Team Lead
10-15 yrs | Assistant Manager
Mid Management Level
15-20 yrs | Manager
20-25 yrs | Head
25-30 yrs | Associate Vice President
30-35 yrs | Vice President
Top Management
And so on...
Performance Evaluation
Key Result Areas (KRAs) and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) should be clearly defined. It should be challenging to move from one level to another. Experience is just one tool for assessment; Performance Appraisal should be a wise tool for evaluation.
I hope this information may be of use to you.
Regards
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Proposed Structure
Based on my experience, I would like to propose the following structure:
Experience Level | Designation | Category
Fresher | Trainee-Engineer
1-2 yrs | Junior or Assistant Engineer
2-4 yrs | Engineer
Staff Level
4-7 yrs | Senior Engineer
7-10 yrs | Team Lead
10-15 yrs | Assistant Manager
Mid Management Level
15-20 yrs | Manager
20-25 yrs | Head
25-30 yrs | Associate Vice President
30-35 yrs | Vice President
Top Management
And so on...
Performance Evaluation
Key Result Areas (KRAs) and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) should be clearly defined. It should be challenging to move from one level to another. Experience is just one tool for assessment; Performance Appraisal should be a wise tool for evaluation.
I hope this information may be of use to you.
Regards
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
Job Evaluation.ppt
Job Evaluation Methodology.doc