CiteHR - Request To Make It More User Friendly

Dear Sir,
Thank you for accepting my request with regard to new threads.
2 more requests.
1) Make available the facility of Scrlloing in New Posts.
2) Eays way to find out all posts made by members.
to see all posts done by me, i have to go to any of my posts & click on my name to find all my posts.
it is difficult. kindly make it easier sir,

Hi Peer,
The scrolling forum names cannot be added immediately in this software - we'll have to spend some time to figure out a way to make it work. For now the way it is should suffice and I believe would help in categorizing the forum better.
To view all your threads you can click on User CP -> Subscribed Threads.
Regards,
Sid [CHR]

We had the Option of No Replies under Human Resource Jobs Section.
Requesting to add that feature in the new version also

my observation is that after cite hr got its new look the good quality discussions have reduced drastically and many good members are now not participating , god knows why ????
im missing the kind of discussions we had in old cite hr....
seems many members are finding it difficult to adjust to new look,,, ??/

Hi <link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google ) , Change is always difficult in the beginning - I see many members adjusting well to the new look and starting good threads now that the "New Thread" option has been added on the topic view page. Things will improve further with the new posting interface which has been enabled for all members now.
The best place to look if you are having trouble understanding the functionality of the website is the FAQ Section.
Regards,
CHR

Dear Sir,

While doing download Search, we do not get the required details

Either we get complete different details or irrelevant details.

Kindly work on this Sir,

the below links are some examples..

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

<link outdated-removed>

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

<link outdated-removed> ( Search On Cite | Search On Google )

Dear Administarator,
The points raised by Peer does need attention. I have similar views on the search functinality of the site.
Regards,
Faizal Haque

Hi Peer,
I will look into this. Can you or anyone please try to elaborate by picking up one of the searches mentioned here and tell me which results were useful and which were not and why - this will help me coding the script accordingly.
Regards,
CHR

dear chr,
i think u have installed, incorporated google search in citehr.
google search is really fastest and accurate...
still dont know why this happens

Google search is only to find topics - to search for downloads you'll have to use the download search which is a in-house coded script - which naturally can be improved.