Hi India Rebel
Sorry, could not get back into this enchanting discussion since I was busy with regular work.
You said
"What about it, Let a junior level guy in your company do the audit of HR work!!!... Or choose the group of the people in your organization to do audit of your people. I know you would never do that.. If a true audit is done of HR work and their mis-doings, HR will not remain there."
Some questions on this:
1) What according to you is HR work?
2) Secondly - how would a junior level guy do any kind of audit with consistency? Even a finance audit is conducted by those studying for ICWA/ICA (not those completed) and the questions they generally ask only betray their lack of knowledge.
I did read your article on hiring malpractises and I agree that some of them do exist - BUT they are NOT as WIDESPREAD as you claim. Please understand that HR people are also human and prone to temptations, like everyone else. As long as money and/or power are treated as the only priority in peoples' lives, there will always be a malpractise of sorts. Despite your experiences, there do happen to be many HR folks who work with integrity.
If you are getting calls from CMM-5 companies, why dont you join them? I know that all the processes (including HR) there would be more stringent than where you currently are.
I am rather curious about the reason you have not disclosed your name. If you wish to be the revealer of TRUTH, perhaps you should also tell us your name. Of course, you may be afraid of being blacklisted by organizations where "whistle blowers" are rejected, but then surely some "honest" organization would hire you.
Since you have so many complaints against HR, who would you nominate to do the work we do? Have you tried to walk in our shoes? If you have, then this discussion would probably not be taking place. :)
You also said "I doubt the statment that HR puts right guy on the right job. HR does not have technical, logistical, psychological abilities to find the right guy."
The first part of that statement is theory, the second is practical - upto a point. For eg. an HR person cannot do a technical evaluation unless they have a formal technical background in that field".
The truth is that HR tries to put the right person in the right job - many times, the factor of time and CTC constraint (given by the organization) makes the HR and the organization compromise. This is reality! Would you like to be told that "we don't find you entirely suitable for the role, but we will try to groom you and hope for the best"? Obviously dissatisfaction will arise from this process. I don't know if you are aware, but even biological twins are dissimilar in behaviours. Each and every human being is different, hence the fitment of person to job is always discussed in the term of "best possible fit". It is very rare that you find a perfect "fits like a glove" candidate for the vacancy. I have seen this only twice or thrice in my career, and hired them.
All the best.
Regards
Ryan