Difference between Mediation and Conciliation
Mediation and conciliation are both forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) that involve a neutral third party assisting parties in resolving their conflicts. Despite their similarities, there are key differences between mediation and conciliation.
Mediation is a voluntary and informal process where a mediator facilitates communication between parties to help them reach a mutually acceptable agreement. The mediator does not impose a solution but rather assists the parties in finding a resolution that satisfies everyone involved.
Conciliation, on the other hand, is a more formal process where a conciliator actively proposes solutions and suggests compromises to help parties reach an agreement. Unlike in mediation, the conciliator takes a more active role in guiding the parties towards a resolution.
In conclusion, while both mediation and conciliation aim to resolve disputes amicably, they differ in their level of formality and the role of the neutral third party. Understanding these distinctions can help parties choose the most suitable method for resolving their conflicts effectively.
Mediation and conciliation are both forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) that involve a neutral third party assisting parties in resolving their conflicts. Despite their similarities, there are key differences between mediation and conciliation.
Mediation is a voluntary and informal process where a mediator facilitates communication between parties to help them reach a mutually acceptable agreement. The mediator does not impose a solution but rather assists the parties in finding a resolution that satisfies everyone involved.
Conciliation, on the other hand, is a more formal process where a conciliator actively proposes solutions and suggests compromises to help parties reach an agreement. Unlike in mediation, the conciliator takes a more active role in guiding the parties towards a resolution.
In conclusion, while both mediation and conciliation aim to resolve disputes amicably, they differ in their level of formality and the role of the neutral third party. Understanding these distinctions can help parties choose the most suitable method for resolving their conflicts effectively.
1 Attachment(s) [Login To View]