Hi,
Strict interpretation of the Payment of Gratuity Act requires a person to complete 5 years of service. 240 days or 190 days will be counted only when the person completes 5 years. If a person works for 4 years and 11 months, then even if he completes 240 days or 190 days as the case may be, we can take the plea that he is not eligible for gratuity.
See section 2A of the Act which is reproduced below:
2A.
2) Where an employee (not being an employee employed in a seasonal establishment) is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1), for any period of one year or six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under the employer - (a) for the said period of one year, if the employee during the period of twelve calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than - (i) one hundred and ninety days, in the case of an employee employed below the ground in a mine or in an establishment which works for less than six days in a week; and (ii) two hundred and forty days, in any other case.
Having said this, I would advise organizations to take a liberal view on this. A liberal view would be 4 years and 240 days if you work for 6 days a week and 4 years and 190 days if you work for less than six days a week.
If you apply this logic, a person is eligible to receive gratuity if he gets paid a salary for 4 years and eight months in a period of 5 years where the establishment works for 6 days.
If the establishment works for less than 6 days a week, then a person getting paid a salary for 4 years and 6 months would be eligible.
I know many organizations take this liberal view.
In a nutshell legally it has to be 5 full years.
If you take a liberal view then it has to be 4 years and 240 days in case of a 6-day week and 4 years and 190 days in case of less than 6 days a week work.
Siva