Hi all,
I work with HSBC Ahmedabad since 05 October 2005 and I am writing this email to highlight the problems that I have had after deciding to tender my resignation from the services of HSBC and to highlight the manner in which a staff member is being dealt with upon exit. Since I have resigned from the services of HSBC on 1 December 2007 (I was willing to serve for 3 months as per the bank's policy of a 3-month notice period) and my line manager has accepted the date of relieving as 31 December 2007, against my request to be relieved from the bank's services on 29 February 2008 (as evident from HR records enclosed below), I am being forced to pay the notice period. For a while, it seems to me that this is a route through which the bank adds to its Net Profits by recovering Notice pay from its staff, but I am sure I am wrong. Throughout after my resignation, I have been threatened by the Branch Manager with termination of my services, blacklisting within the HSBC group, damaging my career, etc., if I do not pay the notice period and bring in more insurance business for him. Let me tell you that there are many staff members who have left the bank due to such dealings and have faced issues by paying money from their pockets because of such dealings.
I have my Provident Fund with the bank, and I am being threatened that I would not receive the PF amount if I don't serve the notice period.
For all the above matters, I have expressed my concerns to the senior team of HSBC on the way a staff member is treated at work and coerced to accept things with the use of abusive language. However, it seems HR has chosen to focus on the notice pay bit and is forcing me to pay the notice period.
I enclose the E-HR resignation print screen, which clearly shows the last working day approved by my line manager.
I will appreciate your reply.
I work with HSBC Ahmedabad since 05 October 2005 and I am writing this email to highlight the problems that I have had after deciding to tender my resignation from the services of HSBC and to highlight the manner in which a staff member is being dealt with upon exit. Since I have resigned from the services of HSBC on 1 December 2007 (I was willing to serve for 3 months as per the bank's policy of a 3-month notice period) and my line manager has accepted the date of relieving as 31 December 2007, against my request to be relieved from the bank's services on 29 February 2008 (as evident from HR records enclosed below), I am being forced to pay the notice period. For a while, it seems to me that this is a route through which the bank adds to its Net Profits by recovering Notice pay from its staff, but I am sure I am wrong. Throughout after my resignation, I have been threatened by the Branch Manager with termination of my services, blacklisting within the HSBC group, damaging my career, etc., if I do not pay the notice period and bring in more insurance business for him. Let me tell you that there are many staff members who have left the bank due to such dealings and have faced issues by paying money from their pockets because of such dealings.
I have my Provident Fund with the bank, and I am being threatened that I would not receive the PF amount if I don't serve the notice period.
For all the above matters, I have expressed my concerns to the senior team of HSBC on the way a staff member is treated at work and coerced to accept things with the use of abusive language. However, it seems HR has chosen to focus on the notice pay bit and is forcing me to pay the notice period.
I enclose the E-HR resignation print screen, which clearly shows the last working day approved by my line manager.
I will appreciate your reply.
2 Attachment(s) [Login To View]