Hi,
Step Number 1
At least closer to 50% of the grievances are imaginary. This is the first presumption generally people have.
I will start with a belief that all grievances are real. So when I talk to the person coming to me with a grievance, he feels I am genuine in attempting to resolve their grievance.
Step Number 2
I will offer him or her a seat and devote time to listen carefully. If it is a serious grievance, then I won't pick up calls for 15 minutes or so.
Step 3
Discuss this grievance with the person concerned. For example, if the grievance is regarding leave, discuss it with the supervisor concerned with the knowledge of his boss. Don't directly call the supervisor and start the discussion. Keep his boss in the loop.
Step 4
Analyze and find out the truth in the grievance. If there is truth, then find a way to resolve it.
(One example: In a factory where I was working as Head of HR, suddenly there was a drop in production in one particular department and the concerned departmental head started putting the blame on the union and a particular workman. When I spoke to the workman, he came out with grievances including discrimination, improper training, etc. The matter became very serious, and my efficiency in handling the situation was questioned. I was counseling the HOD.
I was convinced in this case that there was some truth in the grievance of the workman, and I highlighted this to my peer group. But unfortunately, none heeded my advice.
Then I got into the facts, analyzed, and presented them in two sentences to the top management. The fact was that the particular workman was transferred to that specific machine just 15 days back, and no training was imparted to him. He also seemed to have expressed his opinion that he may take more time to learn, and his learning history had always been poor.
All job cards pertaining to this workman were analyzed, and the facts highlighted.
It was proved that there was no IR issue here, and it was a genuine grievance. The top management took a decision to replace that workman with another and found a suitable job for him. The entire process took nearly 20 to 30 days.)
Step 5
Be neutral, whatever may be the criticism you face. Over a period of time, they will appreciate.
Step 6
Do not jump to any conclusion. Discuss with all, gather data, and do not express opinions in the process.
In other words, the tools to be used are:
1. Listen carefully.
2. Define the grievance.
3. Analyze with past data and present data.
4. Discuss with peer group and the person concerned.
5. Try to make people meet and resolve.
6. Be neutral.
7. Be firm.
I hope I make some sense.
Siva