On 17 December 2025, the Employees Provident Fund Organisation issued a crucial circular defining "continuous service" under the Employees Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme. The clarification, building on an earlier Gazette amendment in July, states that weekends, fixed weekly offs, and national or state holidays falling between the date of exit from one EPF covered job and joining another will not be treated as a break in service for EDLI death claims. Additionally, gaps of up to around sixty days between two EPF establishments can still be treated as continuous service for the purpose of minimum assurance benefits. The minimum payout to nominees in certain cases has been raised to fifty thousand rupees, even if the member had less than twelve months service or a small PF balance.
This change has significant implications for HR and payroll teams. It can determine whether families receive anything at all after an unexpected death. There are cases where a worker left one factory on a Friday, joined another on a Monday, and because Saturday and Sunday were treated as a "break", their family was told they had not completed the required continuous service for higher EDLI cover. The latest clarification will bring relief to many such families, but it also exposes how dependent workers are on meticulous backend data entry by employers, contractors, and consultants.
Legally, this change tightens the bridge between the EDLI Scheme 1976 as amended in 2025 and the broader social security framework under the Code on Social Security 2020. For compliance heads, it is now critical to ensure that exit dates, joining dates, and wage details are accurate and timely in EPFO systems. Internal audit and risk teams should treat EDLI as more than a footnote to PF; it is an insurance obligation with direct human impact and potential litigation risk if claims are mishandled.
If you were heading HR or payroll, what changes would you make immediately in your PF and EDLI data processes after this clarification? How can employers explain EDLI and nomination in simple language so employees and their families are not blindsided at the worst possible time?
This change has significant implications for HR and payroll teams. It can determine whether families receive anything at all after an unexpected death. There are cases where a worker left one factory on a Friday, joined another on a Monday, and because Saturday and Sunday were treated as a "break", their family was told they had not completed the required continuous service for higher EDLI cover. The latest clarification will bring relief to many such families, but it also exposes how dependent workers are on meticulous backend data entry by employers, contractors, and consultants.
Legally, this change tightens the bridge between the EDLI Scheme 1976 as amended in 2025 and the broader social security framework under the Code on Social Security 2020. For compliance heads, it is now critical to ensure that exit dates, joining dates, and wage details are accurate and timely in EPFO systems. Internal audit and risk teams should treat EDLI as more than a footnote to PF; it is an insurance obligation with direct human impact and potential litigation risk if claims are mishandled.
If you were heading HR or payroll, what changes would you make immediately in your PF and EDLI data processes after this clarification? How can employers explain EDLI and nomination in simple language so employees and their families are not blindsided at the worst possible time?