On December 6, 2025, NCP MP Supriya Sule introduced the Right to Disconnect Bill, 2025 in the Lok Sabha, aiming to address India's "always-on" work culture. The proposed law would give employees the legal right to ignore work calls, emails, and messages outside of official hours and on holidays, without fear of disciplinary action. It suggests penalties of 1% of an organization's total employee remuneration for violations and proposes an Employees' Welfare Authority to frame rules, monitor digital overreach, and promote "digital detox." The bill links telepressure, burnout, and info-overload to mental health risks, borrowing ideas from France, Portugal, and other jurisdictions that already protect off-duty time.
For Indian employees, the proposal validates the notion that after-hours communication is not harmless, especially when performance ratings and job security depend on responsiveness. Younger staff often check email late at night and on weekends to avoid being seen as "uncommitted," while managers feel the pressure between global time zones and team well-being. HR leaders recognize the emotional subtext - guilt when you mute notifications, anxiety when you don't, and resentment when personal time is invaded. Even if private member bills rarely pass unchanged, the mere introduction of this one normalizes conversations about healthy boundary-setting in hybrid, chat-driven workplaces.
If elements of this bill become law or are reflected in company policy, they will fundamentally reshape HR and compliance duties. Organizations will need to clearly define "official hours," document emergency-contact rules, log overtime, and compensate off-hour work at proper wage rates instead of dismissing it as "flexibility." Policies on Slack, Teams, and WhatsApp groups will need to distinguish between optional chatter and implicit directives. Leadership will also be expected to model disconnection behavior instead of sending midnight emails with "no need to reply now" disclaimers. For Indian HR heads, this is both a risk and an opportunity: fall behind and risk regulatory or reputational trouble, or get ahead and brand your firm as one that truly respects employees' lives beyond the laptop.
How should companies redesign expectations around after-hours communication without hurting global collaboration? What simple changes in your own workplace today would make it genuinely easier for people to switch off?
For Indian employees, the proposal validates the notion that after-hours communication is not harmless, especially when performance ratings and job security depend on responsiveness. Younger staff often check email late at night and on weekends to avoid being seen as "uncommitted," while managers feel the pressure between global time zones and team well-being. HR leaders recognize the emotional subtext - guilt when you mute notifications, anxiety when you don't, and resentment when personal time is invaded. Even if private member bills rarely pass unchanged, the mere introduction of this one normalizes conversations about healthy boundary-setting in hybrid, chat-driven workplaces.
If elements of this bill become law or are reflected in company policy, they will fundamentally reshape HR and compliance duties. Organizations will need to clearly define "official hours," document emergency-contact rules, log overtime, and compensate off-hour work at proper wage rates instead of dismissing it as "flexibility." Policies on Slack, Teams, and WhatsApp groups will need to distinguish between optional chatter and implicit directives. Leadership will also be expected to model disconnection behavior instead of sending midnight emails with "no need to reply now" disclaimers. For Indian HR heads, this is both a risk and an opportunity: fall behind and risk regulatory or reputational trouble, or get ahead and brand your firm as one that truly respects employees' lives beyond the laptop.
How should companies redesign expectations around after-hours communication without hurting global collaboration? What simple changes in your own workplace today would make it genuinely easier for people to switch off?