On December 3, a viral video emerged from a warehouse in Hyderabad, showing dozens of gig, contract, and daily-wage workers locked inside a fulfillment zone during peak dispatch hours. It was alleged that supervisors locked the shutters to avoid unnecessary breaks, trapping workers for nearly 90 minutes. Workers claimed that this had been happening for weeks. Although management denied the allegations, they admitted to temporary closures for safety reasons. The police have initiated an inquiry and labor officials are scrutinizing attendance and shift logs.
The workers described their terror, feeling more like prisoners than employees. Some expressed fear of fire hazards, while others panicked, thinking they were being punished. A pregnant worker reportedly fainted during one of these lockdowns. The emotional backlash has been severe, with workers now avoiding peak shifts, but fearing a loss of income if they refuse assignments. Their families are outraged, deeming it inhumane treatment. The public has also expressed outrage, comparing the conditions to bonded labor.
Locking workers inside premises is a serious violation of safety and fire norms and can be considered criminal wrongful confinement. Companies are required to maintain open emergency exits, adhere to shift break protocols, and ensure that supervisors cannot override safety procedures. Leadership should establish CCTV-monitored escalation channels, re-train supervisors, and document safety compliance. Warehouse firms may now face extensive inspections, and supply-chain clients may demand proof of ethical working conditions.
Should supervisors face legal accountability for creating unsafe confinement conditions? What worker-safety safeguards should be non-negotiable in warehouses?
The workers described their terror, feeling more like prisoners than employees. Some expressed fear of fire hazards, while others panicked, thinking they were being punished. A pregnant worker reportedly fainted during one of these lockdowns. The emotional backlash has been severe, with workers now avoiding peak shifts, but fearing a loss of income if they refuse assignments. Their families are outraged, deeming it inhumane treatment. The public has also expressed outrage, comparing the conditions to bonded labor.
Locking workers inside premises is a serious violation of safety and fire norms and can be considered criminal wrongful confinement. Companies are required to maintain open emergency exits, adhere to shift break protocols, and ensure that supervisors cannot override safety procedures. Leadership should establish CCTV-monitored escalation channels, re-train supervisors, and document safety compliance. Warehouse firms may now face extensive inspections, and supply-chain clients may demand proof of ethical working conditions.
Should supervisors face legal accountability for creating unsafe confinement conditions? What worker-safety safeguards should be non-negotiable in warehouses?